Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2024
Evaluating AI-generated CBCT-based synthetic CT images for target delineation in palliative treatments of pelvic bone metastasis at conventional C-arm linacs.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hoffmans-Holtzer Nienke, Magallon-Baro Alba, de Pree Ilse, Slagter Cleo, Xu Jiaofeng, Thill Daniel, Olofsen-van Acht Manouk, Hoogeman Mischa, Petit Steven
Аннотация
PURPOSE: One-table treatments with treatment imaging, preparation and delivery occurring at one treatment couch, could increase patients' comfort and throughput for palliative treatments. On regular C-arm linacs, however, cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging quality is currently insufficient. Therefore, our goal was to assess the suitability of AI-generated CBCT based synthetic CT (sCT) images for target delineation and treatment planning for palliative radiotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCTs and planning CT-scans of 22 female patients with pelvic bone metastasis were included. For each CBCT, a corresponding sCT image was generated by a deep learning model in ADMIRE 3.38.0. Radiation oncologists delineated 23 target volumes (TV) on the sCTs (TVsCT) and scored their delineation confidence. The delineations were transferred to planning CTs and manually adjusted if needed to yield gold standard target volumes (TVclin). TVsCT were geometrically compared to TVclin using Dice coefficient (DC) and Hausdorff Distance (HD). The dosimetric impact of TVsCT inaccuracies was evaluated for VMAT plans with different PTV margins.
RESULTS: Radiation oncologists scored the sCT quality as sufficient for 13/23 TVsCT (median: DC = 0.9, HD = 11 mm) and insufficient for 10/23 TVsCT (median: DC = 0.7, HD = 34 mm). For the sufficient category, remaining inaccuracies could be compensated by +1 to +4 mm additional margin to achieve coverage of V95% > 95% and V95% > 98%, respectively in 12/13 TVsCT.
CONCLUSION: The evaluated sCT quality allowed for accurate delineation for most targets. sCTs with insufficient quality could be identified accurately upfront. A moderate PTV margin expansion could address remaining delineation inaccuracies. Therefore, these findings support further exploration of CBCT based one-table treatments on C-arm linacs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCTs and planning CT-scans of 22 female patients with pelvic bone metastasis were included. For each CBCT, a corresponding sCT image was generated by a deep learning model in ADMIRE 3.38.0. Radiation oncologists delineated 23 target volumes (TV) on the sCTs (TVsCT) and scored their delineation confidence. The delineations were transferred to planning CTs and manually adjusted if needed to yield gold standard target volumes (TVclin). TVsCT were geometrically compared to TVclin using Dice coefficient (DC) and Hausdorff Distance (HD). The dosimetric impact of TVsCT inaccuracies was evaluated for VMAT plans with different PTV margins.
RESULTS: Radiation oncologists scored the sCT quality as sufficient for 13/23 TVsCT (median: DC = 0.9, HD = 11 mm) and insufficient for 10/23 TVsCT (median: DC = 0.7, HD = 34 mm). For the sufficient category, remaining inaccuracies could be compensated by +1 to +4 mm additional margin to achieve coverage of V95% > 95% and V95% > 98%, respectively in 12/13 TVsCT.
CONCLUSION: The evaluated sCT quality allowed for accurate delineation for most targets. sCTs with insufficient quality could be identified accurately upfront. A moderate PTV margin expansion could address remaining delineation inaccuracies. Therefore, these findings support further exploration of CBCT based one-table treatments on C-arm linacs.