Head & neck · 2024
Separating distant recurrences from second primaries in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas - A DAHANCA group analysis on paired tumor samples.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kjems Julie, Lilja-Fischer Jacob Kinggaard, Friborg Jeppe, Tramm Trine, Overgaard Jens
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC), there is no clinically available method to separate distant metastases (DMs) from SCC secondary primary tumors. The study aimed to assess the genetic relationship in paired tumor samples.
METHODS: Patients with pairs of solid biopsies from the primary HNSCC and suspected DMs were identified (2007-2017). Targeted next-generation sequencing of 22 genes was applied, including TP53, supplemented with human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping.
RESULTS: Of 55 pairs obtained, 33 were successfully analyzed. Distant biopsies included lung, liver, and bone. A genetic match was found in 23/33 (70%) patients, primarily with identical TP53 mutations or HPV genotypes. In 10/33 patients (30%), the genetic relationship was absent, all with lung involvement. In patients with no lung involvement, 8/8 had a match.
CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients with DMs in HNSCC lack a genetic relationship with the primary tumors. The risk of misclassification is most prominent for patients with lung involvement.
METHODS: Patients with pairs of solid biopsies from the primary HNSCC and suspected DMs were identified (2007-2017). Targeted next-generation sequencing of 22 genes was applied, including TP53, supplemented with human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping.
RESULTS: Of 55 pairs obtained, 33 were successfully analyzed. Distant biopsies included lung, liver, and bone. A genetic match was found in 23/33 (70%) patients, primarily with identical TP53 mutations or HPV genotypes. In 10/33 patients (30%), the genetic relationship was absent, all with lung involvement. In patients with no lung involvement, 8/8 had a match.
CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients with DMs in HNSCC lack a genetic relationship with the primary tumors. The risk of misclassification is most prominent for patients with lung involvement.