Oncology · 2014
Treatment strategy for rectal cancer with synchronous metastasis: 65 consecutive Italian cases from the Bologna Multidisciplinary Rectal Cancer Group.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pinto Carmine, Pini Sara, Di Fabio Francesca, Cuicchi Dajana, Iacopino Bruno, Lecce Ferdinando, Ercolani Giorgio, Rojas Llimpe Fabiola Lorena, De Raffele Emilio, Stella Franco, Di Tullio PierGiorgio, Giaquinta Stefania, Pinna Antonio Daniele, Cola Bruno
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Twenty percent of rectal cancer patients have synchronous distant metastasis at diagnosis. At present, the treatment strategy in this patient setting is not well defined. This study in one institution evaluates the treatment strategy of three different patient groups.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2000 and July 2011, 65 patients with M1 rectal cancer were evaluated. Three different groups were defined: rectal cancer with resectable metastatic disease (group A); rectal cancer with potentially resectable metastatic disease (group B), and rectal cancer with unresectable metastatic disease (group C).
RESULTS: Group A included 11 patients (16.9%), group B 28 patients (43.1%) and group C 26 patients (40%). Forty-three (66.2%) patients underwent surgery for primary rectal cancer, and 30 (46.2%) patients for metastasis resection (23 liver, 4 lung and 3 ovary). Median overall survival (OS) by group was: 51 (5-86; group A), 32 (24-40; group B) and 16 (7-26; group C) months. Patients undergoing metastasis resection have higher median OS than unresected patients (44 vs. 15 months; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The treatment strategy in synchronous metastatic rectal cancer must consider the possibility of distant metastasis resection. Long-term survival can be achieved using an integrated approach.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2000 and July 2011, 65 patients with M1 rectal cancer were evaluated. Three different groups were defined: rectal cancer with resectable metastatic disease (group A); rectal cancer with potentially resectable metastatic disease (group B), and rectal cancer with unresectable metastatic disease (group C).
RESULTS: Group A included 11 patients (16.9%), group B 28 patients (43.1%) and group C 26 patients (40%). Forty-three (66.2%) patients underwent surgery for primary rectal cancer, and 30 (46.2%) patients for metastasis resection (23 liver, 4 lung and 3 ovary). Median overall survival (OS) by group was: 51 (5-86; group A), 32 (24-40; group B) and 16 (7-26; group C) months. Patients undergoing metastasis resection have higher median OS than unresected patients (44 vs. 15 months; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The treatment strategy in synchronous metastatic rectal cancer must consider the possibility of distant metastasis resection. Long-term survival can be achieved using an integrated approach.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationItalyLiver NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTreatment Outcome