Gynecologic oncology · 2014
The role of miR-200a in vasculogenic mimicry and its clinical significance in ovarian cancer.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sun Qingmin, Zou Xi, Zhang Ting, Shen Jian, Yin Yongxiang, Xiang Jingying
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Vasculogenic mimicry (VM) indicates that aggressive cancer cells can form de novo vascular networks and provide a perfusion pathway for rapidly growing tumors. MiR-200a has been reported significantly deregulated in ovarian cancer. However, miR-200a regulation of VM and its clinical significance in ovarian cancer remain not elucidated.
METHODS: In this study, we identified the VM structure by CD34-PAS staining in ovarian cancer tissue. MiR-200a and protein expression was tested by quantitative RT-PCR and western blot. Bioinformatics prediction, luciferase assay and intervention experiments were employed to identify the target of miR-200a.
RESULTS: We certified the VM structure in ovarian cancer, and found that the VM positive rate was significantly associated with tumor grade, stage and metastasis. Further study showed that miR-200a expression levels were significantly lower in VM positive ovarian cancer. In addition, our results suggested that miR-200a inhibited VM by negatively regulated EphA2 expression. Consistently, the inverse correlation of miR-200a and EphA2 has also been found in ovarian cancer patients. Moreover, the expression of miR-200a/EphA2 was significantly associated with patient's clinicopathological parameter, such as tumor stage and metastases. Kaplan-Meier curves confirmed that the patients with low miR-200a expression and/or VM positive had a significantly shorter overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Our research demonstrates that VM, miR-200a and EphA2 play key roles in the progression and prognosis of ovarian cancer, and for the first time suggests that miR-200a inhibits VM by directly regulating EphA2. Therefore, we might have identified a genetic mechanism underlying the involvement of miR-200a in ovarian cancer VM.
METHODS: In this study, we identified the VM structure by CD34-PAS staining in ovarian cancer tissue. MiR-200a and protein expression was tested by quantitative RT-PCR and western blot. Bioinformatics prediction, luciferase assay and intervention experiments were employed to identify the target of miR-200a.
RESULTS: We certified the VM structure in ovarian cancer, and found that the VM positive rate was significantly associated with tumor grade, stage and metastasis. Further study showed that miR-200a expression levels were significantly lower in VM positive ovarian cancer. In addition, our results suggested that miR-200a inhibited VM by negatively regulated EphA2 expression. Consistently, the inverse correlation of miR-200a and EphA2 has also been found in ovarian cancer patients. Moreover, the expression of miR-200a/EphA2 was significantly associated with patient's clinicopathological parameter, such as tumor stage and metastases. Kaplan-Meier curves confirmed that the patients with low miR-200a expression and/or VM positive had a significantly shorter overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Our research demonstrates that VM, miR-200a and EphA2 play key roles in the progression and prognosis of ovarian cancer, and for the first time suggests that miR-200a inhibits VM by directly regulating EphA2. Therefore, we might have identified a genetic mechanism underlying the involvement of miR-200a in ovarian cancer VM.