European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2020
Interrater variation of vascular classifications used in enhanced laryngeal contact endoscopy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mehlum Camilla Slot, Døssing Helle, Davaris Nikolaos, Giers Anja, Grøntved Ågot Møller, Kjaergaard Thomas, Möller Sören, Godballe Christian, Arens Christoph
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Combined use of contact endoscopy (CE) and Narrow Band Imaging (NBI, Olympus®) is suggested for the visualization of specific vascular changes indicative of glottic neoplasia. We investigated the interrater reliability and agreement in 3 recognized classification systems of vascular changes applied to images from CE + NBI in patients suspected for glottic neoplasia.
METHODS: Six experienced head and neck surgeons familiar with NBI rated 120 images obtained by CE + NBI by 3 classification systems of vascular changes as suggested by Ni et al. (N-C), Puxeddu et al. (P-C), and the European Laryngological Society (ELS-C). Three raters were experienced in CE, and three raters had only limited experience with CE. Crude agreement and Fleiss' kappa with 95% confidence interval were estimated for all 6 raters, and for the 2 levels of expertise for each original classification system and for dichotomized versions of the N-C and the P-C based on suggested neoplastic potential.
RESULTS: The interrater crude agreement and the corresponding kappa values for the ELS-C were good and significantly higher than those for the N-C and P-C for all raters, irrespective of the level of experience with CE (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between the N-C and the P-C (p = 0.16). Kappa was considerably improved for both the N-C and the P-C to a level not different from the ELS-C (p = 0.21-0.71) when their 5 original categories were pooled into dichotomized classifications.
CONCLUSION: Difficulties in reliably classifying vascular changes in CE + NBI are evident. Two-tier classification systems are the most reliable.
METHODS: Six experienced head and neck surgeons familiar with NBI rated 120 images obtained by CE + NBI by 3 classification systems of vascular changes as suggested by Ni et al. (N-C), Puxeddu et al. (P-C), and the European Laryngological Society (ELS-C). Three raters were experienced in CE, and three raters had only limited experience with CE. Crude agreement and Fleiss' kappa with 95% confidence interval were estimated for all 6 raters, and for the 2 levels of expertise for each original classification system and for dichotomized versions of the N-C and the P-C based on suggested neoplastic potential.
RESULTS: The interrater crude agreement and the corresponding kappa values for the ELS-C were good and significantly higher than those for the N-C and P-C for all raters, irrespective of the level of experience with CE (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between the N-C and the P-C (p = 0.16). Kappa was considerably improved for both the N-C and the P-C to a level not different from the ELS-C (p = 0.21-0.71) when their 5 original categories were pooled into dichotomized classifications.
CONCLUSION: Difficulties in reliably classifying vascular changes in CE + NBI are evident. Two-tier classification systems are the most reliable.