MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-44247-8

Медицинская библиотека · Scientific reports · 2023

Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) in rectal cancer treatment within an expert center.

Piątkowski Jacek, Jagielski Mateusz, Szeliga Jacek, Nowak Mariusz, Jackowski Marek

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The objective of this study was to evaluate treatment outcomes in patients who underwent the TaTME procedure for cancer of the middle and low rectum in an expert center. Prospective analysis of the outcomes of all consecutive patients treated using the TaTME technique for cancer of the middle and distal rectum at the our medical center between March 1, 2015, and March 31, 2022. A total of 128 patients (34 women, 94 men; mean age 66.01 [38-85] years) with cancer of the middle and distal rectum qualified for TaTME. TaTME procedures were performed in 127/128 (99.22%) patients. Complications of surgery were observed in 22/127 (17.32%) patients. Negative proximal and distal margins were confirmed in all 127 patients. Complete (R0) resection of the mesorectum was confirmed in 125/127 (98.43%) and nearly complete (R1) resection was confirmed in 2/127 (1.57%) patients. The average follow-up period was 795 days (296-1522) days. Local recurrence was detected during the follow-up period in 2/127 (1.57%) patients. This study showed that the TaTME procedure is an effective and safe method for the minimally invasive treatment of middle and low rectal cancers, particularly within an expert center setting.

Для цитирования: Piątkowski Jacek, Jagielski Mateusz, Szeliga Jacek, Nowak Mariusz, Jackowski Marek. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) in rectal cancer treatment within an expert center.. Scientific reports. 2023. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-44247-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.