DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109791
National questionnaire on skills and techniques in pediatric tracheotomy surgery in Turkey.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the study was to determine the differences in surgical preferences of ENT Surgeons in Turkey with regard to pediatric tracheotomy.
DESIGN
Questionnaire study.
PARTICIPANTS
ENT Surgeons.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
The national multiple-choice questionnaire study included a total of 16 questions about physicians technical preferences, different methods and complications in pediatric tracheotomy surgery. It was planned and implemented with the support of a professional survey company (www.surveymonkey.com).
RESULTS
The questionnaire was answered by 591 ENT Surgeons; the percentage of the physicians performing pediatric tracheotomies in the previous year was 59.6%. Forty point four percent (40.4%) of the physicians had not performed tracheotomies in the pediatric age group and 57.9% had not performed tracheotomies in patients under one year old. Seventy point six percent (70.6%) of the physicians who had performed tracheotomies had made vertical skin incisions, 69.5% of them had removed subcutaneous adipose tissue, 81.4% of them had retraction the thyroid isthmus area from their field of view; 83.9% of them had made a vertical incision to the trachea, 82.5% of them had applied a stay suture to the trachea and 4.7% of them had used additional techniques for stoma maturation. The intraoperative mortality, early complication, late complication, and total complication rates were 3.9%, 32.7%, 21.2% and 53.9 respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
This is the first large-scale questionnaire study with data on pediatric tracheotomy techniques and the practices of ENT Surgeons at a national level. Common approaches were observed among the.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.