DOI 10.1016/j.reumae.2026.502159
Quantitative assessment of interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most common pulmonary affection of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients with a severe RA-ILD extent i.e. >20% according to chest Computed Tomography (CT) semiquantitative (SQCT) scores, have poor prognosis. Quantitative CT (QCT) assessment with operator independent methods based on free software represents a reliable solution already tested in other ILD related to rheumatic diseases.
OBJECTIVES
The main objective of this monocentric study is to verify if in RA-ILD there is a correlation between QCT and SQCT performed by experienced radiologists. Secondary aims are: (a) to explore if there is a difference of QTC indexes (QCTi) in RA-ILD patients with severe vs mild ILD extent; (b) to evaluate the discriminative ability of QCT in identifying severe RA-ILD patients.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
The chest CTs of consecutive RA-ILD underwent to a SQCT assessment by two experienced chest radiologists. All CTs were also blindly post-processed by a rheumatologist in order to obtain the QCTi. QCTi correlations, distribution and discriminative ability were, respectively, verified using Spearman rank test, Mann-Whitney test and ROC curves.
RESULTS
The majority of QCTi showed a moderate degree (0.40<r<0.59) with SQCT assessment (p-value<0.01). Patients with severe and mild ILD had dissimilar QCTi values (p=0.001). Almost all of QCTi had a good discriminative ability (AUC from 0.73 to 0.81, p-value=0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
These preliminary findings suggest that RA-ILD extent is related to QCTi. Moreover, QCTi can discriminate very well patients with a severe ILD. So, QCTi may become simple tools quickly estimate RA-ILD prognosis.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.