European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2003
Treatment and outcomes of oesophageal perforation in a tertiary referral centre.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Muir A D, White J, McGuigan J A, McManus K G, Graham A N
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis and management of oesophageal perforation continues to challenge clinicians. We present our experience of perforated oesophagus in a Tertiary Referral Centre for Thoracic and Oesophageal Surgery.
METHODS: Between 1985 and 2000, 75 patients (40 male) with oesophageal perforation were treated in out unit; age range 24-89, median 63. Retrospective review of these cases has been performed.
RESULTS: There were 12 deaths (16%). With increases in time from perforation to diagnosis, there was a stepwise increase in the mortality rate. Immediate diagnosis 5%; early diagnosis (1-24h) 14%; late diagnosis (>24h) 44% (P>or=0.002). Site of perforation, aetiology, and treatment strategy had no influence on mortality. The only independent predictor of mortality identified was time to diagnosis from perforation (beta 0.429, P=0.001). Time to definitive management in those undergoing an operative procedure had no influence on outcome with multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Prompt recognition of the diagnosis of oesophageal perforation and rapid institution of supportive measures, followed by an appropriate, patient specific treatment option optimises the chance of a successful outcome. The wide range of presentation of oesophageal perforation necessitates individualisation of treatment.
METHODS: Between 1985 and 2000, 75 patients (40 male) with oesophageal perforation were treated in out unit; age range 24-89, median 63. Retrospective review of these cases has been performed.
RESULTS: There were 12 deaths (16%). With increases in time from perforation to diagnosis, there was a stepwise increase in the mortality rate. Immediate diagnosis 5%; early diagnosis (1-24h) 14%; late diagnosis (>24h) 44% (P>or=0.002). Site of perforation, aetiology, and treatment strategy had no influence on mortality. The only independent predictor of mortality identified was time to diagnosis from perforation (beta 0.429, P=0.001). Time to definitive management in those undergoing an operative procedure had no influence on outcome with multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Prompt recognition of the diagnosis of oesophageal perforation and rapid institution of supportive measures, followed by an appropriate, patient specific treatment option optimises the chance of a successful outcome. The wide range of presentation of oesophageal perforation necessitates individualisation of treatment.