Head & neck · 2016
ACR Appropriateness criteria® for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Saba Nabil F, Salama Joseph K, Beitler Jonathan J, Busse Paul M, Cooper Jay S, Jones Christopher U, Koyfman Shlomo, Quon Harry, Ridge John A, Siddiqui Farzan, Worden Francis, Yao Min, Yom Sue S, Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology-Head and Neck Cancer
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) presents mostly with locally advanced disease and is treated with multimodal therapy; however, consensus is lacking for different clinical scenarios.
METHODS: The American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria® are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
RESULTS: The ACR Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology - Head and Neck Cancer developed consensus recommendations for guiding management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary evaluation is essential to guiding the optimal use of surgery, radiation, and systemic therapy in this disease. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 979-986, 2016.
METHODS: The American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria® are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
RESULTS: The ACR Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology - Head and Neck Cancer developed consensus recommendations for guiding management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary evaluation is essential to guiding the optimal use of surgery, radiation, and systemic therapy in this disease. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 979-986, 2016.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
CarcinomaChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalEarly Detection of CancerEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansMaleNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsNasopharynxNeoplasm InvasivenessPractice Guidelines as TopicPrognosisQuality of LifeSocieties, MedicalSurvival AnalysisUnited States