DEN open · 2025
When Endoscopic Sedation is Not an Option: Insights From a Multicenter on-site Survey on Tolerance for Japanese Gastric Cancer Screening.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Inoki Kazuya, Chiba Toshiya, Miura Kazuhiro, Tagawa Teppei, Aoyagi Yutaka, Takeuchi Yoshiaki, Moriyama Naoya, Kuraoka Kensuke, Ohara Tadashi, Haruhara Yuko, Mizuki Akira, Satio Jun, Hagisawa Yoshimi, Ono Naomi, Takayama Noboru, Onishi Takeo, Mishima Akira, Suzuki Norihiro, Kikuchi Kazuo, Katagiri Atsushi, Yamamura Fuyuhiko, Ohde Sachiko, Inoue Eisuke, Matsuda Takahisa, Yoshida Hitoshi
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is widely used for gastric cancer (GC) screening in Japan; however, sedation during EGD is not recommended. We aimed to assess the tolerability of unsedated EGD (USEGD) in the Japanese population.
METHODS: Participants who underwent GC screening in Japanese urban areas between July 2021 and December 2022 were included in this study. We conducted a real-time questionnaire survey on USEGD invasiveness in 16 clinics and hospitals. Participants completed a self-report questionnaire, including a six-point face scale, immediately after undergoing USEGD with an ultrathin endoscope for GC screening, and were placed into the tolerable (T group) or intolerable groups (I group) based on the scores 1-3 and 4-6 on the face scale, respectively.
RESULTS: The 1021 participants (median age, 59 years; interquartile range, 59-74 years) consisted of 561 men and 437 women, while 23 preferred not to answer. Of the 777 participants who underwent USEGD using an ultrathin endoscope, 135 (17.4%) were categorized into the intolerable (I) group based on severe distress, and 642 (82.6%) into the tolerable (T) group. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that older age (odds ratio [OR]: 0.974; p = 0.008) and prior USEGD experience (OR: 0.527; p = 0.006) were associated with higher tolerability. Conversely, females (OR: 2.498; p < 0.001) and first-time EGD experience (OR: 2.202; p = 0.003) were associated with lower tolerability.
CONCLUSIONS: USEGD was generally well-tolerated; however, some participants found it intolerable, even with transnasal endoscopy. Supportive measures for these individuals are essential for sustaining effective screening programs.
METHODS: Participants who underwent GC screening in Japanese urban areas between July 2021 and December 2022 were included in this study. We conducted a real-time questionnaire survey on USEGD invasiveness in 16 clinics and hospitals. Participants completed a self-report questionnaire, including a six-point face scale, immediately after undergoing USEGD with an ultrathin endoscope for GC screening, and were placed into the tolerable (T group) or intolerable groups (I group) based on the scores 1-3 and 4-6 on the face scale, respectively.
RESULTS: The 1021 participants (median age, 59 years; interquartile range, 59-74 years) consisted of 561 men and 437 women, while 23 preferred not to answer. Of the 777 participants who underwent USEGD using an ultrathin endoscope, 135 (17.4%) were categorized into the intolerable (I) group based on severe distress, and 642 (82.6%) into the tolerable (T) group. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that older age (odds ratio [OR]: 0.974; p = 0.008) and prior USEGD experience (OR: 0.527; p = 0.006) were associated with higher tolerability. Conversely, females (OR: 2.498; p < 0.001) and first-time EGD experience (OR: 2.202; p = 0.003) were associated with lower tolerability.
CONCLUSIONS: USEGD was generally well-tolerated; however, some participants found it intolerable, even with transnasal endoscopy. Supportive measures for these individuals are essential for sustaining effective screening programs.