MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/ijt.ijt_23_19

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of trichology · 2019

Expert consensus on the management of Telogen Effluvium in India.

Mysore Venkataram, Parthasaradhi Anchala, Kharkar R D, Ghoshal A K, Ganjoo Anil, Ravichandran G, Saraswat Abir, Shah Yogesh, Singh Mohan, Remadevi T J, Matte Prachi

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Alopecia, a frequently reported problem, severely impacts the quality of life of patients and is often associated with loss of confidence and low self-esteem. Several conditions such as telogen effluvium (TE), anagen effluvium, diffuse type of alopecia areata, female pattern hair loss, hair shaft abnormalities, loose anagen hair syndrome, and congenital atrichia or hypotrichosis are associated with hair loss. The actual prevalence rate of TE is not reported since most cases are subclinical in nature. Further, since women get more distressed by hair fall and promptly seek treatment, they tend to be over-represented. However, both genders can suffer from this condition if triggering factors are present. This consensus paper was developed by taking into account opinions of renowned experts in the field and is hoped to serve as an evidence-based platform for selecting efficacious and safe therapy for patients with TE. This review presents a synopsis of the key opinions of experts on all aspects of treatment and effective management of this condition.

Для цитирования: Mysore Venkataram, Parthasaradhi Anchala, Kharkar R D, Ghoshal A K, Ganjoo Anil, Ravichandran G, Saraswat Abir, Shah Yogesh, Singh Mohan, Remadevi T J, Matte Prachi. Expert consensus on the management of Telogen Effluvium in India.. International journal of trichology. 2019. DOI: 10.4103/ijt.ijt_23_19.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.