Digestive diseases and sciences · 2020
Long-Term Outcome of Endoscopic Balloon Dilation for Duodenal Crohn's Disease-Associated Strictures.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Juanjuan, Li Yi, Diao Yanqing, Da Binlin, Wang Zhiming
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Duodenal Crohn's disease (CD) is rare and may present with obstructive symptoms, and few reports have focused on endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) for duodenal CD-associated strictures.
AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of EBD for duodenal CD-associated strictures.
METHODS: Patients with duodenal CD-associated strictures who underwent EBD were recruited. The clinical date, stricture characteristics, number of EBDs, dilation diameter, complications, surgical interventions, and follow-up periods were recorded. Patients were also divided into a serial dilation group and a nonserial dilation group to analyze the efficacy and safety of serial EBD for duodenal strictures.
RESULTS: A total of 54 patients with duodenal CD-associated strictures underwent a total of 153 dilations. Technical success was achieved in 98.69% (151/153) of cases. The short-term efficacy at 1 month and 2 months was 100%. At a median follow-up period of 223 days (range 30-866), 11 patients underwent surgery, and the total clinical efficacy was 79.63% (43/54). No difference in the safety or efficacy was noted between the serial dilation group and the nonserial dilation group. The median surgery-free survival of 507 days (range 170-857) and the median recurrence-free survival of 215 days (range 30-866) in the serial dilation group were significantly longer than those in the nonserial dilation group (185.5 days (range 73-275) and 124 days (range 30-699), respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: EBD is a safe and effective treatment for duodenal CD-associated strictures. Serial dilations could delay recurrence and surgical intervention but did not change the long-term outcome or prevent surgery.
AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of EBD for duodenal CD-associated strictures.
METHODS: Patients with duodenal CD-associated strictures who underwent EBD were recruited. The clinical date, stricture characteristics, number of EBDs, dilation diameter, complications, surgical interventions, and follow-up periods were recorded. Patients were also divided into a serial dilation group and a nonserial dilation group to analyze the efficacy and safety of serial EBD for duodenal strictures.
RESULTS: A total of 54 patients with duodenal CD-associated strictures underwent a total of 153 dilations. Technical success was achieved in 98.69% (151/153) of cases. The short-term efficacy at 1 month and 2 months was 100%. At a median follow-up period of 223 days (range 30-866), 11 patients underwent surgery, and the total clinical efficacy was 79.63% (43/54). No difference in the safety or efficacy was noted between the serial dilation group and the nonserial dilation group. The median surgery-free survival of 507 days (range 170-857) and the median recurrence-free survival of 215 days (range 30-866) in the serial dilation group were significantly longer than those in the nonserial dilation group (185.5 days (range 73-275) and 124 days (range 30-699), respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: EBD is a safe and effective treatment for duodenal CD-associated strictures. Serial dilations could delay recurrence and surgical intervention but did not change the long-term outcome or prevent surgery.