Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU · 2011
Comparison of ultrasonographically guided fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of parotid masses.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huang Yu-Chieh, Wu Chen-Te, Lin Gigin, Chuang Wen-Yu, Yeow Kee-Min, Wan Yung-Liang
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To retrospectively compare the accuracies of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (USFNA) and ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (USCNB) in the diagnosis of parotid masses.
METHODS: A total of 171 patients (aged 17-86 years, mean 54 years) with parotid masses (35 malignant and 136 benign lesions) underwent either USFNA (n = 107) or USCNB (n = 64). The diagnostic accuracies for differentiating benign from malignant lesions of both examinations were compared. Surgical histopathology (n = 104) and clinical diagnosis (n = 67) were used to establish the final diagnoses.
RESULTS: USCNB had a significantly higher sensitivity (94.1%) than USFNA (55.6%) (p < 0.05) in differentiating benign lesions from malignant conditions. The specificity and overall accuracy of USCNB were higher than those of USFNA (100% and 98.4% versus 93.3% and 86.9%, respectively). USCNB provided more specific diagnosis than USFNA (100% versus 93.3%, p < 0.05). All six patients with lymphomas who underwent USCNB were accurately diagnosed, whereas all four patients with lymphomas who underwent USFNA were not.
CONCLUSIONS: USCNB should be preferred to USFNA when a definite diagnosis of a parotid solid mass is needed.
METHODS: A total of 171 patients (aged 17-86 years, mean 54 years) with parotid masses (35 malignant and 136 benign lesions) underwent either USFNA (n = 107) or USCNB (n = 64). The diagnostic accuracies for differentiating benign from malignant lesions of both examinations were compared. Surgical histopathology (n = 104) and clinical diagnosis (n = 67) were used to establish the final diagnoses.
RESULTS: USCNB had a significantly higher sensitivity (94.1%) than USFNA (55.6%) (p < 0.05) in differentiating benign lesions from malignant conditions. The specificity and overall accuracy of USCNB were higher than those of USFNA (100% and 98.4% versus 93.3% and 86.9%, respectively). USCNB provided more specific diagnosis than USFNA (100% versus 93.3%, p < 0.05). All six patients with lymphomas who underwent USCNB were accurately diagnosed, whereas all four patients with lymphomas who underwent USFNA were not.
CONCLUSIONS: USCNB should be preferred to USFNA when a definite diagnosis of a parotid solid mass is needed.