Urology · 2017
A Randomized Comparison of 2 Robotic Virtual Reality Simulators and Evaluation of Trainees' Skills Transfer to a Simulated Robotic Urethrovesical Anastomosis Task.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hoogenes Jen, Wong Nathan, Al-Harbi Badr, Kim Kevin S, Vij Saahil, Bolognone Elisa, Quantz Mackenzie, Guo Yanbo, Shayegan Bobby, Matsumoto Edward D
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine, via a randomized comparison study, whether robotic simulator-acquired skills transfer to performance of a urethrovesical anastomosis (UVA) on a 3-dimensional-printed bladder model using the da Vinci Robot.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical students, surgical residents, and fellows were recruited and divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (G1) (junior trainees) and Group 2 (G2) (senior trainees). Participants were randomized to identical simulator training curricula on the dV-Trainer (dV-T) or da Vinci Surgical Skills Simulator (dVSSS). Participants then completed a UVA task on a 3-dimensional-printed bladder model using the da Vinci robot. Three blinded expert robotic surgeons rated videotaped performances of the UVA task using validated assessment tools, namely, the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS; overall procedure) and Robotic Anastomosis Competence Evaluation (RACE; specific to UVA).
RESULTS: Thirty-nine participants (G1 = 23 and G2 = 16) completed the study. Participants in G2 had significantly more simulation and surgical experience compared with G1 (P <.05). UVA scores of the dVSSS group were higher compared with dV-T (GEARS: P = .09; RACE: P = .01). In the G1 cohort, dVSSS scores were significantly higher than dV-T (GEARS: P = .01; RACE: P <.01). In the G2 cohort, scores were statistically similar (GEARS: P = .32; RACE: P = .91).
CONCLUSION: Compared with the dV-T, the dVSSS training led to superior GEARS and RACE scores for performance of the UVA task in junior trainees, but not in senior trainees. The dVSSS can be used to improve surgical skills acquisition in less experienced trainees in a safe and effective manner.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical students, surgical residents, and fellows were recruited and divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (G1) (junior trainees) and Group 2 (G2) (senior trainees). Participants were randomized to identical simulator training curricula on the dV-Trainer (dV-T) or da Vinci Surgical Skills Simulator (dVSSS). Participants then completed a UVA task on a 3-dimensional-printed bladder model using the da Vinci robot. Three blinded expert robotic surgeons rated videotaped performances of the UVA task using validated assessment tools, namely, the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS; overall procedure) and Robotic Anastomosis Competence Evaluation (RACE; specific to UVA).
RESULTS: Thirty-nine participants (G1 = 23 and G2 = 16) completed the study. Participants in G2 had significantly more simulation and surgical experience compared with G1 (P <.05). UVA scores of the dVSSS group were higher compared with dV-T (GEARS: P = .09; RACE: P = .01). In the G1 cohort, dVSSS scores were significantly higher than dV-T (GEARS: P = .01; RACE: P <.01). In the G2 cohort, scores were statistically similar (GEARS: P = .32; RACE: P = .91).
CONCLUSION: Compared with the dV-T, the dVSSS training led to superior GEARS and RACE scores for performance of the UVA task in junior trainees, but not in senior trainees. The dVSSS can be used to improve surgical skills acquisition in less experienced trainees in a safe and effective manner.