MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1532-950x.2013.12037.x

Медицинская библиотека · Veterinary surgery : VS · 2013

Foaling rates after surgical repair of ventral cervical lacerations using a Trendelenburg position in 18 anesthetized mares.

Leary John Mark O', Rodgerson Dwayne, Spirito Michael, Gomez Jorge

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To (1) describe a surgical technique for repair of lacerations of the ventral aspect of the cervix in anesthetized mares in Trendelenburg position; and (2) report conception rates and foaling after repair.

STUDY

DESIGN

Case series.

ANIMALS: Mares (n = 18).

METHODS

Cervical lacerations were repaired in 2 layers with anesthetized mares in Trendelenburg position. The cervix was retracted caudally with stay-sutures, and after excision of the healed margin of the laceration, the internal cervical mucosa and fibromuscular tissue were sutured in 1 layer with a continuous Lembert pattern. The external cervical mucosa was sutured using a simple-continuous suture pattern. Number of foals produced by each mare before and after surgical repair was obtained from client/farm communication and from a commercial record keeping service.

RESULTS

Mean repair time for 1 laceration was 22 minutes and for 2 lacerations was 29 minutes. Nine mares conceived and 7 had at least 1 live healthy foal.

CONCLUSION

Trendelenburg position allows for efficient repair of a ventrally located cervical laceration in anesthetized mares.

Для цитирования: Leary John Mark O', Rodgerson Dwayne, Spirito Michael, Gomez Jorge. Foaling rates after surgical repair of ventral cervical lacerations using a Trendelenburg position in 18 anesthetized mares.. Veterinary surgery : VS. 2013. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.2013.12037.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.