BJU international · 2006
The use of a suprascrotal or 'wink' incision for placing a testicular prosthesis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Libman Jamie L, Pippi-Salle Joao-Luiz, Chan Peter T K
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To describe a suprascrotal technique of testicular prosthesis insertion that obviates the difficulties and complications associated with either the inguinal or scrotal approach, as although the insertion of a testicular prosthesis is common there are few reports of the various techniques of insertion, associated complication rates, and patient satisfaction.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight males (aged 14-26 years) who had had a previous orchidectomy, had a testicular prosthesis inserted using a suprascrotal incision. A 2-cm semilunar incision is made just above the scrotum, 2-3 cm lateral to the penis ('wink' incision). The prosthesis is inserted after developing the intrascrotal space with blunt dissection. All patients tolerated the procedure well and all were outpatient procedures.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 12 months, all patients were satisfied with the aesthetics of the prosthesis. Incisions were hidden by pubic hair. There were no wound infections at the incision site, and no reports of any pain or discomfort associated with the prosthesis.
CONCLUSION: The 'wink' incision is an attractive alternative for inserting a testicular prosthesis; the advantages of the suprascrotal approach include: (i) the incision is hidden by pubic hair; (ii) no difficult dissection through fibrotic tissue in patients who have had previous inguinal surgery; and (iii) avoidance of direct contact between the prosthesis and suture line, minimizing the risk of infection, erosion and postoperative pain, while maintaining a pouch of adequate size.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight males (aged 14-26 years) who had had a previous orchidectomy, had a testicular prosthesis inserted using a suprascrotal incision. A 2-cm semilunar incision is made just above the scrotum, 2-3 cm lateral to the penis ('wink' incision). The prosthesis is inserted after developing the intrascrotal space with blunt dissection. All patients tolerated the procedure well and all were outpatient procedures.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 12 months, all patients were satisfied with the aesthetics of the prosthesis. Incisions were hidden by pubic hair. There were no wound infections at the incision site, and no reports of any pain or discomfort associated with the prosthesis.
CONCLUSION: The 'wink' incision is an attractive alternative for inserting a testicular prosthesis; the advantages of the suprascrotal approach include: (i) the incision is hidden by pubic hair; (ii) no difficult dissection through fibrotic tissue in patients who have had previous inguinal surgery; and (iii) avoidance of direct contact between the prosthesis and suture line, minimizing the risk of infection, erosion and postoperative pain, while maintaining a pouch of adequate size.