European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2013
Conization using the Shimodaira-Taniguchi procedure for adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hiramatsu Kosuke, Ueda Yutaka, Yoshino Kiyoshi, Fujita Masami, Morii Eiichi, Enomoto Takayuki, Kimura Tadashi
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization procedure addresses the disadvantages of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) by using a high frequency current and a triangular probe with a linear excision electrode to extract the tissue as a single informative specimen, without incurring accompanying thermal trauma. The aim of the present study was to analyze the surgical efficacy of the Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization procedure for adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the uterine cervix.
STUDY DESIGN: At the Osaka University Hospital, conization using the Shimodaira-Taniguchi procedure has long been routinely performed for AIS. Medical records of patients during the period from 2005 to 2011, whose post-conization diagnosis was AIS, were retrospectively analyzed. A literature review was conducted of the PubMed database to clarify the surgical outcome efficacy of the Shimodaira-Taniguchi procedure compared to other procedures.
RESULTS: During the study period, a post-conization diagnosis of AIS was made in 10 patients. A positive resection margin was detected in 4 of the 10 cases (40%), and residual disease was observed in 3 cases (30%). A review of the relevant literature indicates that the rate of positive margin and residual disease by the Shimodaira-Taniguchi procedure, including our cases, was not significantly different from the cold knife, LEEP or laser procedures (p=0.32, 0.99, and 0.40, respectively, for positive margin, and p=0.76, 0.94, and 0.063, respectively, for residual disease).
CONCLUSION: AIS was demonstrated to be efficaciously treated, with a low risk of residual disease, by the Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization procedure. Further study is still needed to establish a standard of conservative treatment for AIS.
STUDY DESIGN: At the Osaka University Hospital, conization using the Shimodaira-Taniguchi procedure has long been routinely performed for AIS. Medical records of patients during the period from 2005 to 2011, whose post-conization diagnosis was AIS, were retrospectively analyzed. A literature review was conducted of the PubMed database to clarify the surgical outcome efficacy of the Shimodaira-Taniguchi procedure compared to other procedures.
RESULTS: During the study period, a post-conization diagnosis of AIS was made in 10 patients. A positive resection margin was detected in 4 of the 10 cases (40%), and residual disease was observed in 3 cases (30%). A review of the relevant literature indicates that the rate of positive margin and residual disease by the Shimodaira-Taniguchi procedure, including our cases, was not significantly different from the cold knife, LEEP or laser procedures (p=0.32, 0.99, and 0.40, respectively, for positive margin, and p=0.76, 0.94, and 0.063, respectively, for residual disease).
CONCLUSION: AIS was demonstrated to be efficaciously treated, with a low risk of residual disease, by the Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization procedure. Further study is still needed to establish a standard of conservative treatment for AIS.