The British journal of radiology · 2017
Ultrasound guided high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) ablating uterine leiomyoma with homogeneous hyperintensity on T2 weighted MR imaging.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yang Shenghua, Kong Fanjing, Hou Ruijie, Rong Fengmei, Ma Nana, Li Shaoping, Yang Jun
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficiency of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa)-ablating symptomatic uterine leiomyoma with homogeneous hyperintensity on T2 weighted MRI prospectively.
METHODS: A total of 34 patients with 42 symptomatic uterine leiomyomas with homogeneous hyperintensity on T2 weighted MRI were enrolled in our study. In the patient who had multiple uterine leiomyomas, only one dominant leiomyoma was treated. According to the principles of voluntariness, 18 patients underwent a 3-month therapy of GnRHa (once a month) before the high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment, while 16 patients received only HIFU treatment. Enhanced MRI was performed before and after GnRHa and HIFU treatment. Evaluation of the main indicators included treatment time, sonication time, treatment efficiency, non-perfused volume (NPV) (indicative of successful ablation) ratio and energy effect ratio; adverse events were also recorded.
RESULTS: The treatment time and sonication time of the combination group were 102.0 min (55.8-152.2 min) and 25.4 min (12.2-34.1 min); however, they were 149.0 min (87.0-210.0 min) and 38.9 min (14.0-46.7 min) in the simple USgHIFU group. The treatment and sonication time for the combination group was significantly shorter than that for the simple USgHIFU group. Treatment efficiency, NPV ratio and energy effect ratio were 46.7 mm3 s-1 (28.5-95.8 mm3 s-1), 69.2 ± 29.8% (35.5-97.4%) and 9.9 KJ mm-3 (4.5-15.7 KJ mm-3) in the combination group, respectively; but, the lowest treatment efficiency, lowest NPV ratio and more energy effect ratio were observed in the simple HIFU group, which were 16.8 mm3 s-1 (8.9-32.9 mm3 s-1), 50.2 ± 27.3% (0-78.6%) and 23.8 KJ mm-3 (12.4-46.2 KJ mm-3), respectively. Pain scores in the combination group were 3.0 ± 0.5 points (2-4 points)-significantly less than the simple USgHIFU group. There were no significant adverse reactions in either group.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that USgHIFU combined with GnRHa may be performed to ablate symptomatic uterine leiomyoma with homogeneous hyperintensity on T2 weighted MRI. Advances in knowledge: The conclusions indicate that GnRHa can improve the effectiveness of the USgHIFU treatment of a homogeneous hyperintense leiomyoma on T2 weighted MRI, and combination treatment could be a promising alternative treatment for the uterine leiomyoma.
METHODS: A total of 34 patients with 42 symptomatic uterine leiomyomas with homogeneous hyperintensity on T2 weighted MRI were enrolled in our study. In the patient who had multiple uterine leiomyomas, only one dominant leiomyoma was treated. According to the principles of voluntariness, 18 patients underwent a 3-month therapy of GnRHa (once a month) before the high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment, while 16 patients received only HIFU treatment. Enhanced MRI was performed before and after GnRHa and HIFU treatment. Evaluation of the main indicators included treatment time, sonication time, treatment efficiency, non-perfused volume (NPV) (indicative of successful ablation) ratio and energy effect ratio; adverse events were also recorded.
RESULTS: The treatment time and sonication time of the combination group were 102.0 min (55.8-152.2 min) and 25.4 min (12.2-34.1 min); however, they were 149.0 min (87.0-210.0 min) and 38.9 min (14.0-46.7 min) in the simple USgHIFU group. The treatment and sonication time for the combination group was significantly shorter than that for the simple USgHIFU group. Treatment efficiency, NPV ratio and energy effect ratio were 46.7 mm3 s-1 (28.5-95.8 mm3 s-1), 69.2 ± 29.8% (35.5-97.4%) and 9.9 KJ mm-3 (4.5-15.7 KJ mm-3) in the combination group, respectively; but, the lowest treatment efficiency, lowest NPV ratio and more energy effect ratio were observed in the simple HIFU group, which were 16.8 mm3 s-1 (8.9-32.9 mm3 s-1), 50.2 ± 27.3% (0-78.6%) and 23.8 KJ mm-3 (12.4-46.2 KJ mm-3), respectively. Pain scores in the combination group were 3.0 ± 0.5 points (2-4 points)-significantly less than the simple USgHIFU group. There were no significant adverse reactions in either group.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that USgHIFU combined with GnRHa may be performed to ablate symptomatic uterine leiomyoma with homogeneous hyperintensity on T2 weighted MRI. Advances in knowledge: The conclusions indicate that GnRHa can improve the effectiveness of the USgHIFU treatment of a homogeneous hyperintense leiomyoma on T2 weighted MRI, and combination treatment could be a promising alternative treatment for the uterine leiomyoma.