Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association · 2023
A Hue-Value method for semi-automated assessment of Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ravikumar Ayeswarya, Queener Hope M, Osae Eugene A, Ritchey Eric R
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) is a marker of an abnormal lid/cornea interaction. This study proposes an automated Hue-Value grading algorithm of LWE staining following manual selection of the region of interest.
METHODS: Images of LWE staining were processed using Hue and Value from HSV (Hue-Saturation-Value) color space with a custom MATLAB program. Thirty-one images were successfully analyzed. Examiners analyzed images in random order twice, separated by more than a week. Bland Altman and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were performed.
RESULTS: There was no difference (p > 0.05) between upper (UL) and lower (LL) eyelids for LWE height (UL: 0.12 ± 0.12 mm, LL: 0.12 ± 0.07 mm), width (UL: 10.70 ± 3.84 mm, LL: 10.26 ± 3.49 mm), or area (UL: 2.85 ± 2.67 mm2, LL: 2.63 ± 1.71 mm2). There was no between examiner difference for all eyelid LWE height or area (p > 0.05), but a difference in LWE width (0.16 mm; p = 0.031). ICC for LWE height, width and area were 0.996 (95% CI: 0.993 to 0.998), 0.997 (95% CI: 0.992 to 0.998) and 0.999 (95% CI: 0.998 to 0.999). There was no between examiner difference for height or area (p > 0.05) for UL, but a difference in LWE width (0.28 mm; p = 0.026). ICC for height, width and area were 0.999 (95% CI: 0.996 to 1.00), 0.995 (95% CI: 0.982 to 0.999) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.999 to 1.00). There was no difference in LWE height, width or area for LL (all p > 0.05). ICC were 0.991 (95% CI: 0.973 to 0.997) for height, 0.998 (95% CI: 0.995 to 0.999) for width and 0.997 (95% CI: 0.990 to 0.999) for area.
CONCLUSIONS: This novel method results in highly repeatable interexaminer measures of LWE staining after general lid region delineation. Small differences in LWE width were observed between examiners.
METHODS: Images of LWE staining were processed using Hue and Value from HSV (Hue-Saturation-Value) color space with a custom MATLAB program. Thirty-one images were successfully analyzed. Examiners analyzed images in random order twice, separated by more than a week. Bland Altman and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were performed.
RESULTS: There was no difference (p > 0.05) between upper (UL) and lower (LL) eyelids for LWE height (UL: 0.12 ± 0.12 mm, LL: 0.12 ± 0.07 mm), width (UL: 10.70 ± 3.84 mm, LL: 10.26 ± 3.49 mm), or area (UL: 2.85 ± 2.67 mm2, LL: 2.63 ± 1.71 mm2). There was no between examiner difference for all eyelid LWE height or area (p > 0.05), but a difference in LWE width (0.16 mm; p = 0.031). ICC for LWE height, width and area were 0.996 (95% CI: 0.993 to 0.998), 0.997 (95% CI: 0.992 to 0.998) and 0.999 (95% CI: 0.998 to 0.999). There was no between examiner difference for height or area (p > 0.05) for UL, but a difference in LWE width (0.28 mm; p = 0.026). ICC for height, width and area were 0.999 (95% CI: 0.996 to 1.00), 0.995 (95% CI: 0.982 to 0.999) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.999 to 1.00). There was no difference in LWE height, width or area for LL (all p > 0.05). ICC were 0.991 (95% CI: 0.973 to 0.997) for height, 0.998 (95% CI: 0.995 to 0.999) for width and 0.997 (95% CI: 0.990 to 0.999) for area.
CONCLUSIONS: This novel method results in highly repeatable interexaminer measures of LWE staining after general lid region delineation. Small differences in LWE width were observed between examiners.