Advances in therapy · 2014
Clinical usefulness of diquafosol for real-world dry eye patients: a prospective, open-label, non-interventional, observational study.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yamaguchi Masahiko, Nishijima Takeshi, Shimazaki Jun, Takamura Etsuko, Yokoi Norihiko, Watanabe Hitoshi, Ohashi Yuichi
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution in dry eye patients in clinical practice.
METHODS: Subjects were dry eye patients who had never used diquafosol, and observation was conducted prospectively over 2 months. The corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining score, tear film break-up time, 12 dry eye-related subjective symptoms, patient-reported outcomes, and adverse events were investigated.
RESULTS: Data were collected from 465 medical institutions for 3,196 patients. Diquafosol led to significant improvement in all subjective symptoms and objective findings (P < 0.001, paired t test). Diquafosol was effective regardless of the degree of severity according to the corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining score or therapeutic pattern. Overall, 76.0% patients responded that their condition had improved. Adverse reactions were observed in 6.3% of patients. The major adverse reactions were eye discharge, eye irritation, and eye pain.
CONCLUSION: Diquafosol was effective for various dry eye patients in clinical practice, and no significant safety-related problems occurred.
METHODS: Subjects were dry eye patients who had never used diquafosol, and observation was conducted prospectively over 2 months. The corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining score, tear film break-up time, 12 dry eye-related subjective symptoms, patient-reported outcomes, and adverse events were investigated.
RESULTS: Data were collected from 465 medical institutions for 3,196 patients. Diquafosol led to significant improvement in all subjective symptoms and objective findings (P < 0.001, paired t test). Diquafosol was effective regardless of the degree of severity according to the corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining score or therapeutic pattern. Overall, 76.0% patients responded that their condition had improved. Adverse reactions were observed in 6.3% of patients. The major adverse reactions were eye discharge, eye irritation, and eye pain.
CONCLUSION: Diquafosol was effective for various dry eye patients in clinical practice, and no significant safety-related problems occurred.