F1000Research · 2023
Successful use of conjunctival flaps to prolong survival of type I keratoprosthesis in severe bilateral chemical burns: two case reports.
Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mahuvakar Sheetal, Jain Neha, Basu Sayan
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: This report describes the use of conjunctival flaps to enable the survival of type I keratoprosthesis (KPro) in two cases of bilateral severe total limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) following chemical burns.
PRESENTATION OF CASE: Two patients had a history of bilateral chemical injury with lime. On examination, the presenting vision was light perception to hand motions and both cases had conjunctivalized ocular surfaces with symblepharon. A modified technique of type I keratoprosthesis was used, where the conjunctivalized corneal pannus was dissected and lifted off as an inferior fornix-based conjunctival flap. This was followed by a standard surgical technique of type I KPro. The flap was then secured over the device and optical opening was made two weeks later. Both the patients had stable ocular surfaces with visual acuity of 20/20 at 2-7 years of follow-up.
DISCUSSION: In patients with total LSCD with adnexal involvement, type I KPro has unsatisfactory long-term survival because of the risk of repeated epithelial breakdowns and stromal ulceration. With the innovative approach described in this report, type I KPro can be successfully used for sustainable visual improvement in the presence of severe ocular surface disease and symblepharon.
CONCLUSION: Conjunctival flaps can be used along with type I KPros to improve long-term survival and give sustainable visual outcomes in cases of bilateral corneal blindness due to advanced ocular surface damage.
PRESENTATION OF CASE: Two patients had a history of bilateral chemical injury with lime. On examination, the presenting vision was light perception to hand motions and both cases had conjunctivalized ocular surfaces with symblepharon. A modified technique of type I keratoprosthesis was used, where the conjunctivalized corneal pannus was dissected and lifted off as an inferior fornix-based conjunctival flap. This was followed by a standard surgical technique of type I KPro. The flap was then secured over the device and optical opening was made two weeks later. Both the patients had stable ocular surfaces with visual acuity of 20/20 at 2-7 years of follow-up.
DISCUSSION: In patients with total LSCD with adnexal involvement, type I KPro has unsatisfactory long-term survival because of the risk of repeated epithelial breakdowns and stromal ulceration. With the innovative approach described in this report, type I KPro can be successfully used for sustainable visual improvement in the presence of severe ocular surface disease and symblepharon.
CONCLUSION: Conjunctival flaps can be used along with type I KPros to improve long-term survival and give sustainable visual outcomes in cases of bilateral corneal blindness due to advanced ocular surface damage.