Case reports in ophthalmology · 2014
Atypical manifestation of conjunctival epithelial inclusion cyst: a case report.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim Dong Hyun, Khwarg Sang In, Oh Joo Youn
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To report a case of primary conjunctival epithelial inclusion cyst with atypical manifestation.
METHODS: A 66-year-old woman presented with a yellowish, subconjunctival mass extending from the corneal limbus to the medial canthus in the left eye. Clinical, radiological and histological assays were performed.
RESULTS: The mass was well-delineated, and the overlying conjunctiva was normal. An enhanced axial orbit computed tomography scan showed a 7.7 × 3.6 mm, well-demarcated, convex-shaped enhanced mass. Neither a connection to the orbital area nor extrusion of intraconal fat was observed. Histological examination revealed that the lesion was a cystic mass that was lined by nonkeratinized, stratified squamous epithelium, and filled with mucous materials and cellular debris. The histologic diagnosis was consistent with conjunctival epithelial inclusion cyst.
CONCLUSION: A careful examination using clinical, radiologic and histological studies is essential for the differential diagnosis of subconjunctival mass.
METHODS: A 66-year-old woman presented with a yellowish, subconjunctival mass extending from the corneal limbus to the medial canthus in the left eye. Clinical, radiological and histological assays were performed.
RESULTS: The mass was well-delineated, and the overlying conjunctiva was normal. An enhanced axial orbit computed tomography scan showed a 7.7 × 3.6 mm, well-demarcated, convex-shaped enhanced mass. Neither a connection to the orbital area nor extrusion of intraconal fat was observed. Histological examination revealed that the lesion was a cystic mass that was lined by nonkeratinized, stratified squamous epithelium, and filled with mucous materials and cellular debris. The histologic diagnosis was consistent with conjunctival epithelial inclusion cyst.
CONCLUSION: A careful examination using clinical, radiologic and histological studies is essential for the differential diagnosis of subconjunctival mass.