MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1055/s-0038-1676036

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2018

Spontaneous Otogenic Pneumocephalus: Case Series and Update on Management.

Eggerstedt Michael, Hong Scott, Eddelman Daniel B, Smith Ryan M, Munoz Lorenzo, Byrne Rich W, Wiet R Mark

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Objectives  This study is aimed to report the largest independent case series of spontaneous otogenic pneumocephalus (SOP) and review its pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment. Design  Four patients underwent a middle cranial fossa approach for repair of the tegmen tympani and tegmen mastoideum. A comprehensive review of the literature regarding this disease entity was performed. Setting  U.S. tertiary academic medical center.

Participants

Patients presenting to the lead author's clinic or to the emergency department with radiographic evidence of SOP. Symptoms included headache, otalgia, and neurologic deficits. Main Outcome Measures  Patients were assessed for length of stay, postoperative length of stay, and neurologic outcome. Three of four patients returned to their neurologic baseline following repair. Results  Four patients were successfully managed via a middle cranial fossa approach to repairing the tegmen mastoideum. Conclusion  The middle cranial fossa approach is an effective strategy to repair defects of the tegmen mastoideum. SOP remains a clinically rare disease, with little published information on its diagnosis and treatment.

Для цитирования: Eggerstedt Michael, Hong Scott, Eddelman Daniel B, Smith Ryan M, Munoz Lorenzo, Byrne Rich W, Wiet R Mark. Spontaneous Otogenic Pneumocephalus: Case Series and Update on Management.. Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base. 2018. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676036.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.