Scandinavian journal of urology · 2017
Laparoscopic repyeloplasty after failed open repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a case-matched multi-institutional study.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hammady Ahmed, Elbadry Mohamed S, Rashed El-Nesr, Moussa Ahmed, Gamal Wael, Dawood Waleed, Fahmy Ahmed, Abdelkareem Ali, Mahfouz Wally
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to retrospectively review the experience and midterm results of laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) in patients with previous failed open pyeloplasty in comparison to primary LP.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients who had undergone previous failed open surgery for management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) were reviewed. The patients underwent transperitoneal dismembered LP. All operations were performed by the same laparoscopist from March 2009 to June 2013. Surgical results were compared to 72 patients who underwent primary LP carried out by the same surgeon during the same period.
RESULTS: The laparoscopic repyeloplasty group consisted of 14 men and 18 women. The mean age was 29 ± 6 years. The mean operative period was 133 ± 42 and 110 ± 57 min; the mean length of stay in hospital was 2.7 ± 2.3 and 1.3 ± 2.1 days; and the mean follow-up period was 32.4 ± 14 and 29.3 ± 11.2 months in the secondary and primary LP groups, respectively. The success rate was 90.6% for secondary LP and 94.4% for primary LP. There was no conversion in either group. The percentage of intraoperative and postoperative complications in secondary LP was 9.4% and 12.5%, respectively, compared with 0% and 5.6% in the primary LP group.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic repyeloplasty is a safe and viable treatment option for secondary UPJO, with a success rate similar to that of primary repair but with longer operative time. Considerable experience in laparoscopic reconstructive procedures is a prerequisite for optimal results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients who had undergone previous failed open surgery for management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) were reviewed. The patients underwent transperitoneal dismembered LP. All operations were performed by the same laparoscopist from March 2009 to June 2013. Surgical results were compared to 72 patients who underwent primary LP carried out by the same surgeon during the same period.
RESULTS: The laparoscopic repyeloplasty group consisted of 14 men and 18 women. The mean age was 29 ± 6 years. The mean operative period was 133 ± 42 and 110 ± 57 min; the mean length of stay in hospital was 2.7 ± 2.3 and 1.3 ± 2.1 days; and the mean follow-up period was 32.4 ± 14 and 29.3 ± 11.2 months in the secondary and primary LP groups, respectively. The success rate was 90.6% for secondary LP and 94.4% for primary LP. There was no conversion in either group. The percentage of intraoperative and postoperative complications in secondary LP was 9.4% and 12.5%, respectively, compared with 0% and 5.6% in the primary LP group.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic repyeloplasty is a safe and viable treatment option for secondary UPJO, with a success rate similar to that of primary repair but with longer operative time. Considerable experience in laparoscopic reconstructive procedures is a prerequisite for optimal results.