American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2016
Intraperitoneal Vancomycin Plus Either Oral Moxifloxacin or Intraperitoneal Ceftazidime for the Treatment of Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Peritonitis: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xu Rong, Yang Zhikai, Qu Zhen, Wang Huan, Tian Xue, Johnson David W, Dong Jie
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Intraperitoneal administration of antibiotics is recommended as a first treatment for managing peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis. However, the efficacy of oral administration of quinolones has not been well studied.
STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled pilot study.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 80 eligible patients with PD-related peritonitis from Peking University First Hospital (40 in each arm).
INTERVENTION: Intraperitoneal vancomycin, 1g, every 5 days plus oral moxifloxacin, 400mg, every day (treatment group) versus intraperitoneal vancomycin, 1g, every 5 days plus intraperitoneal ceftazidime, 1g, every day (control group).
OUTCOMES: The primary end point was complete resolution of peritonitis, and secondary end points were primary or secondary treatment failure.
MEASUREMENTS: PD effluent white blood cell count.
RESULTS: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the 2 groups were comparable. There were 24 and 22 Gram-positive organisms, 6 and 7 Gram-negative organisms, 9 and 10 culture-negative samples, and 1 and 1 fungal sample in the treatment and control groups, respectively. Complete resolution of peritonitis was achieved in 78% and 80% of cases in the treatment and control groups, respectively (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.30-2.52; P=0.8). There were 3 and 1 cases of relapse in the treatment and control groups, respectively. Primary and secondary treatment failure rates were not significantly different (33% vs 20% and 10% vs 13%, respectively). In each group, there was 1 peritonitis-related death and 6 transfers to hemodialysis therapy. During the 3-month follow-up period, 7 and 3 successive episodes of peritonitis occurred in the treatment and control groups, respectively. Only 2 adverse drug reactions (mild nausea and mild rash, respectively) were observed in the 2 groups.
LIMITATIONS: Sample size was relatively small and the eligibility ratio was low. Also, the number of peritonitis episodes was low, limiting the power to detect a difference between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that intraperitoneal vancomycin with oral moxifloxacin is a safe, well-tolerated, practical, and effective first-line treatment for PD-related peritonitis. Larger adequately powered clinical trials are warranted.
STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled pilot study.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 80 eligible patients with PD-related peritonitis from Peking University First Hospital (40 in each arm).
INTERVENTION: Intraperitoneal vancomycin, 1g, every 5 days plus oral moxifloxacin, 400mg, every day (treatment group) versus intraperitoneal vancomycin, 1g, every 5 days plus intraperitoneal ceftazidime, 1g, every day (control group).
OUTCOMES: The primary end point was complete resolution of peritonitis, and secondary end points were primary or secondary treatment failure.
MEASUREMENTS: PD effluent white blood cell count.
RESULTS: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the 2 groups were comparable. There were 24 and 22 Gram-positive organisms, 6 and 7 Gram-negative organisms, 9 and 10 culture-negative samples, and 1 and 1 fungal sample in the treatment and control groups, respectively. Complete resolution of peritonitis was achieved in 78% and 80% of cases in the treatment and control groups, respectively (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.30-2.52; P=0.8). There were 3 and 1 cases of relapse in the treatment and control groups, respectively. Primary and secondary treatment failure rates were not significantly different (33% vs 20% and 10% vs 13%, respectively). In each group, there was 1 peritonitis-related death and 6 transfers to hemodialysis therapy. During the 3-month follow-up period, 7 and 3 successive episodes of peritonitis occurred in the treatment and control groups, respectively. Only 2 adverse drug reactions (mild nausea and mild rash, respectively) were observed in the 2 groups.
LIMITATIONS: Sample size was relatively small and the eligibility ratio was low. Also, the number of peritonitis episodes was low, limiting the power to detect a difference between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that intraperitoneal vancomycin with oral moxifloxacin is a safe, well-tolerated, practical, and effective first-line treatment for PD-related peritonitis. Larger adequately powered clinical trials are warranted.