European journal of preventive cardiology · 2023
Proteomic profiling identifies novel independent relationships between inflammatory proteins and myocardial infarction.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Valdes-Marquez Elsa, Clarke Robert, Hill Michael, Watkins Hugh, Hopewell Jemma C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Inflammation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease, but the relevance and independence of individual inflammatory proteins is uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationships between a spectrum of inflammatory proteins and myocardial infarction (MI).
METHODS AND RESULTS: A panel of 92 inflammatory proteins was assessed using an OLINK multiplex immunoassay among 432 MI cases (diagnosed < 66 years) and 323 controls. Logistic regression was used to estimate associations between individual proteins and MI, after adjustment for established cardiovascular risk factors and medication use, and stepwise regression to identify proteins with independent effects. Machine learning techniques (Boruta analysis and LASSO regression) and bioinformatic resources were used to examine the concordance of results with those obtained by conventional methods and explore the underlying biological processes to inform the validity of the associations. Among the 92 proteins studied, 62 (67%) had plasma concentrations above the lower limit of detection in at least 50% of samples. Of these, 15 individual proteins were significantly associated with MI after covariate adjustment and correction for multiple testing. Five of these 15 proteins (CDCP1, CD6, IL1-8R1, IL-6, and CXCL1) were independently associated with MI, with up to three-fold higher risks of MI per doubling in plasma concentrations. Findings were further validated using machine learning techniques and biologically focused analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: This study, demonstrating independent relationships between five inflammatory proteins and MI, provides important novel insights into the inflammatory hypothesis of MI and the potential utility of proteomic analyses in precision medicine.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationships between a spectrum of inflammatory proteins and myocardial infarction (MI).
METHODS AND RESULTS: A panel of 92 inflammatory proteins was assessed using an OLINK multiplex immunoassay among 432 MI cases (diagnosed < 66 years) and 323 controls. Logistic regression was used to estimate associations between individual proteins and MI, after adjustment for established cardiovascular risk factors and medication use, and stepwise regression to identify proteins with independent effects. Machine learning techniques (Boruta analysis and LASSO regression) and bioinformatic resources were used to examine the concordance of results with those obtained by conventional methods and explore the underlying biological processes to inform the validity of the associations. Among the 92 proteins studied, 62 (67%) had plasma concentrations above the lower limit of detection in at least 50% of samples. Of these, 15 individual proteins were significantly associated with MI after covariate adjustment and correction for multiple testing. Five of these 15 proteins (CDCP1, CD6, IL1-8R1, IL-6, and CXCL1) were independently associated with MI, with up to three-fold higher risks of MI per doubling in plasma concentrations. Findings were further validated using machine learning techniques and biologically focused analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: This study, demonstrating independent relationships between five inflammatory proteins and MI, provides important novel insights into the inflammatory hypothesis of MI and the potential utility of proteomic analyses in precision medicine.