MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Annali italiani di chirurgia · 2018

The correlation between laboratory markers and computed tomography severity index in acute appendicitis.

Akturk Yeliz, Gunes Serra Ozbal, Hekimoglu Baki

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: A M: This study aimed to evaluate and to investigate the association of some laboratory markers with the stage of the acute appendicitis.

MATER AL AND

METHODS

The hematological parameters (white blood cell count, red cell distribution width, platellet distribution width, mean corpuscular volume, and mean platelet volume values) and tomography scans of 200 patients who admitted to the emergency department with abdominal pain were retrospectively reviewed. Computed tomography grading about the severity of the cases was carried out by two radiologists, as grade 0 for normal appendix to grade 3 for perforated appencities. The hematological results of the patients were recorded for each severity group and were compared to detect whether there was a change in the hematological parameters as the severity in CT increases.

RESULTS

There was no difference in white blood cell count and red cell distribution width levels but mean platelet volume seemed to decrease as the tomography severity index increased.

CONCLUS ONS: Our data suggests that the most reliable instrument to detect appendicitis in the emergency environment is the computed tomography.

KEY WORDS: Acute appencitis, Computed tomography, RDW, PDW, MPV, MCV.

Для цитирования: Akturk Yeliz, Gunes Serra Ozbal, Hekimoglu Baki. The correlation between laboratory markers and computed tomography severity index in acute appendicitis.. Annali italiani di chirurgia. 2018.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.