MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · La Tunisie medicale · 2016

Digestive neuroendocrine tumors: reclassifying of 26 cases according to 2010 who classification.

Chaabane Abir, M'sakni Issam, Laabidi Basma, Bougrine Fathi, Bouziani Ammar

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The classification of digestive neuroendocrine tumors is difficult due to their heterogeneity and rareness.

AIMS: Reclassify the digestive neuroendocrine tumors according  to  the  WHO-2010 classification .

Methods

A retrospective study included   26 patients having digestive neuroendocrine     tumors ,  is achieved  in our  Pathology  Laboratory  of the Military Hospital of  Tunis between 2000 and 2013.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 49.64 years. The Sex ratio was  1.36. It was 6 gastric tumors, 5 small intestine tumors , 5 pancreatic tumors, 5  appendix tumors , one hypatic tumor, one  gall bladder  tumor , one rectal tumor and one colon tumor. According to the WHO -2000 classification, tumors are categorised into 11 well differentiated  endocrine tumors, 13 well differentiated  endocrine carcinoma  and 2 poorly differentiated carcinoma . According to the WHO -2010 classification, tumors were re-evaluated as  16 neuroendocrine tumors grade 1, 6 neuroendocrine tumors grade 2 and 4 neuroendocrine carcinoma .

CONCLUSION

There was a concordance between the two classifications in 93% of cases. The WHO -2010 classification may allow a  better classification for the digestive neuroendocrine tumors, however there are some histological categories that remained difficult to classify.

Для цитирования: Chaabane Abir, M'sakni Issam, Laabidi Basma, Bougrine Fathi, Bouziani Ammar. Digestive neuroendocrine tumors: reclassifying of 26 cases according to 2010 who classification.. La Tunisie medicale. 2016.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.