Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 1997
Per oral balloon sialoplasty: results in the treatment of salivary duct stenosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Brown A L, Shepherd D, Buckenham T M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of balloon dilatation of salivary duct stenosis and to discuss the technique and its limitations.
METHODS: Balloon dilatation of 30 salivary duct stenoses (24 parotid, 6 submandibular) was carried out in 29 patients over a 5-year period. Duct dilatation was performed with a 3-mm-diameter balloon on a 0.035-inch wire passed into the salivary duct under fluoroscopic guidance. The follow-up period ranged from 1 month to 5 years.
RESULTS: In 25 patients balloon dilatation was technically successful in 26 of 30 ducts (87%). Ninety-six percent of parotid duct dilatations and 50% of submandibular duct dilatations were technically successful. Early clinical follow-up after parotid duct dilatation showed that 57% of patients were asymptomatic, 39% showed an improvement in symptoms, and 4% showed no improvement in symptoms. Following technically successful submandibular duct dilatation (3 cases), 1 patient showed complete resolution of symptoms and 1 showed no change in symptoms. No follow-up was available for 1 patient. No significant complications were seen. The longer-term results are presented.
CONCLUSION: Balloon dilatation of salivary duct stenosis is a simple, safe, and clinically effective method of relieving obstructive symptoms of parotid duct stenosis.
METHODS: Balloon dilatation of 30 salivary duct stenoses (24 parotid, 6 submandibular) was carried out in 29 patients over a 5-year period. Duct dilatation was performed with a 3-mm-diameter balloon on a 0.035-inch wire passed into the salivary duct under fluoroscopic guidance. The follow-up period ranged from 1 month to 5 years.
RESULTS: In 25 patients balloon dilatation was technically successful in 26 of 30 ducts (87%). Ninety-six percent of parotid duct dilatations and 50% of submandibular duct dilatations were technically successful. Early clinical follow-up after parotid duct dilatation showed that 57% of patients were asymptomatic, 39% showed an improvement in symptoms, and 4% showed no improvement in symptoms. Following technically successful submandibular duct dilatation (3 cases), 1 patient showed complete resolution of symptoms and 1 showed no change in symptoms. No follow-up was available for 1 patient. No significant complications were seen. The longer-term results are presented.
CONCLUSION: Balloon dilatation of salivary duct stenosis is a simple, safe, and clinically effective method of relieving obstructive symptoms of parotid duct stenosis.