Japanese journal of radiology · 2021
Could both intrinsic and extrinsic iodine be successfully suppressed on virtual non-contrast CT images for detecting thyroid calcification?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Park Arim, Lee Young Hen, Seo Hyung Suk
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Although virtual non-contrast (VNC) successfully removes iodinated contrast, uncertainty exists regarding the feasibility of VNC to suppress iodine for detecting thyroid calcification. Therefore, we evaluated whether both intrinsic and extrinsic iodine attenuation were suppressed on VNC images.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We enrolled 128 patients (male: female 17:111; age 48.0 ± 10.4 years) who underwent dual-layer dual-energy CT (DL-DECT) examination before their thyroid cancer surgeries. Two additional sets of VNC (VNCu, VNCc) images were retrospectively generated from their true unenhanced (TUE) and true contrast-enhanced (TCE) series. We compared CT attenuation values measured on the VNCu and VNCc images by drawing identical regions of interest encompassing thyroid parenchyma, then subjectively determined the concordance of calcification.
RESULTS: Although CT attenuation discrepancies between the VNCu and VNCc were significant (2.0 ± 5.7HU, p < 0.001),61.7%, 89.1%, and 100.0% of all measurements were < 5HU, < 10HU, and < 15HU. Based on Bland-Altman analysis, the limits of agreement were - 9.2HU and 13.2HU, whereas the proportional differences were small for VNC images generated from both TUE and TCE images. There was no discordance between two VNC image sets in detecting thyroid calcification.
CONCLUSIONS: VNC technique could be a feasible method to suppress both intrinsic and extrinsically administered iodine for detecting thyroid calcification.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We enrolled 128 patients (male: female 17:111; age 48.0 ± 10.4 years) who underwent dual-layer dual-energy CT (DL-DECT) examination before their thyroid cancer surgeries. Two additional sets of VNC (VNCu, VNCc) images were retrospectively generated from their true unenhanced (TUE) and true contrast-enhanced (TCE) series. We compared CT attenuation values measured on the VNCu and VNCc images by drawing identical regions of interest encompassing thyroid parenchyma, then subjectively determined the concordance of calcification.
RESULTS: Although CT attenuation discrepancies between the VNCu and VNCc were significant (2.0 ± 5.7HU, p < 0.001),61.7%, 89.1%, and 100.0% of all measurements were < 5HU, < 10HU, and < 15HU. Based on Bland-Altman analysis, the limits of agreement were - 9.2HU and 13.2HU, whereas the proportional differences were small for VNC images generated from both TUE and TCE images. There was no discordance between two VNC image sets in detecting thyroid calcification.
CONCLUSIONS: VNC technique could be a feasible method to suppress both intrinsic and extrinsically administered iodine for detecting thyroid calcification.