Ai zheng = Aizheng = Chinese journal of cancer · 2002
[Comparison of three surgical approachs for cardiac carcinoma].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guo Guo-ping
Аннотация
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: The surgical approach for cardiac carcinoma are various. However, there was still controversial which one could resulting in is the best one to the middle-long term survival rate after the surgical operation. The current study was designed to explore the best surgical approach for cardiac carcinoma.
METHODS: The authors analyzed 353 patients with cardiac carcinoma in Yangzhong People's Hospital. The survival rate and stump masculine rate among three surgery approach (improved epigastrium, left-chest, and epigastrium-chest groups) were compared.
RESULTS: The five-year survival rate and stump masculine rate: epigastrium group were 46.2% and 1.46%; left-chest group were 37.6%, 1.64%; epigastrium-chest group were 57.6% and 2.08%; There was no significant difference among three groups(P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Different surgical approach have no obvious influences to middle-long survival rate and stump masculine rate, thus, the authors suggest the surgery approach should based on location and bound of focus and health condition of the patient.
METHODS: The authors analyzed 353 patients with cardiac carcinoma in Yangzhong People's Hospital. The survival rate and stump masculine rate among three surgery approach (improved epigastrium, left-chest, and epigastrium-chest groups) were compared.
RESULTS: The five-year survival rate and stump masculine rate: epigastrium group were 46.2% and 1.46%; left-chest group were 37.6%, 1.64%; epigastrium-chest group were 57.6% and 2.08%; There was no significant difference among three groups(P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Different surgical approach have no obvious influences to middle-long survival rate and stump masculine rate, thus, the authors suggest the surgery approach should based on location and bound of focus and health condition of the patient.