Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease · 2015
The clinical impact of the detection of potential etiologic pathogens of community-acquired pneumonia.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gelfer Gita, Leggett James, Myers Jillian, Wang Luan, Gilbert David N
Аннотация
The etiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is determined in less than half of the patients based on cultures of sputum and blood plus testing urine for the antigens of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila. This study added nasal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) probes for S. pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and respiratory viruses. Serum procalcitonin (PCT) levels were measured. Pathogens were identified in 78% of the patients. For detection of viruses, patients were randomized to either a 5-virus laboratory-generated PCR bundle or the 17-virus FilmArray PCR platform. The FilmArray PCR platform detected more viruses than the laboratory-generated bundle and did so in less than 2 hours. There were fewer days of antibiotic therapy, P = 0.003, in CAP patients with viral infections and a low serum PCT levels.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntigens, BacterialBacteriaBloodCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCommunity-Acquired InfectionsDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasal CavityPneumonia, BacterialPneumonia, ViralPolymerase Chain ReactionProtein PrecursorsSputumUrineViruses