Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology · 2012
Analysis of the biomechanical feasibility of a wide implant in moderately atrophic maxillary sinus region with finite element method.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Tao, Yang Xinjie, Zhang Dawei, Zhou Hong, Shao Jinling, Ding Yin, Kong Liang
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical feasibility of a short wide implant in a moderately atrophic posterior maxilla.
STUDY DESIGN: A normal maxillary posterior section with a standard screwed implant (model 1) and a moderately atrophic maxillary posterior section with a short wide screwed implant (model 2) were created. The maximum von Mises stresses in maxilla and the maximum displacements in the implant-abutment complex were evaluated.
RESULTS: When the implant diameter exceeded 5.0 mm, the most stable and minimal value of stress in maxilla and displacement in the implant-abutment complex could be achieved in model 2, which were almost all lower than those in model 1.
CONCLUSIONS: The effect of a short wide implant in the moderately atrophic maxillary sinus region is favorable and similar to that of the standard implant in the normal sinus region. From the biomechanical point of view, implant diameter exceeding 5.0 mm is a relatively optimal selection in a moderately atrophic maxilla.
STUDY DESIGN: A normal maxillary posterior section with a standard screwed implant (model 1) and a moderately atrophic maxillary posterior section with a short wide screwed implant (model 2) were created. The maximum von Mises stresses in maxilla and the maximum displacements in the implant-abutment complex were evaluated.
RESULTS: When the implant diameter exceeded 5.0 mm, the most stable and minimal value of stress in maxilla and displacement in the implant-abutment complex could be achieved in model 2, which were almost all lower than those in model 1.
CONCLUSIONS: The effect of a short wide implant in the moderately atrophic maxillary sinus region is favorable and similar to that of the standard implant in the normal sinus region. From the biomechanical point of view, implant diameter exceeding 5.0 mm is a relatively optimal selection in a moderately atrophic maxilla.