International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2011
Cadaveric comparison of canine fossa vs transnasal maxillary sinus access.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Feldt Brent Alan, McMains Kevin Christopher, Weitzel Erik Kent
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Anatomic limitations complicate complete eradication of debris from the maxillary sinus using an exclusively transnasal (TN) endoscopic technique. Creation of a canine fossa trephination (CFT) permits a more direct approach than removal via the maxillary ostium.
METHODS: Microdebrider eradication of debris completely filling the maxillary sinus was performed on 5 thawed fresh-frozen cadaver heads (10 sides) using a TN or CFT approach. Postdebridement computed tomography (CT) scanning assessed remaining debris. Additional outcome measures included time of debris removal, number of different angled blades utilized, and clogging.
RESULTS: A significantly greater amount of debris was left after the TN approach compared with CFT (3.88 cm(3) vs 2.88 cm(3), p = 0.015). Median blade utilization was significantly higher with the TN approach vs CFT (4 vs 1, p < 0.002). Time for debris eradication with CFT was similar regardless of expertise (323.4 vs 272.4 seconds, p = 0.21), but the TN approach showed a statistical difference in time-to-completion (698.8 vs 438.51 seconds, p = 1.7 × 10(-5)).
CONCLUSION: Controversy surrounds the appropriate application of CFT due to disease process and approach-related morbidity. Rhinologists should have numerous well-studied options at their disposal. This model suggests that maxillary debris removal is accomplished more thoroughly with fewer microdebrider blades when a CFT approach is employed.
METHODS: Microdebrider eradication of debris completely filling the maxillary sinus was performed on 5 thawed fresh-frozen cadaver heads (10 sides) using a TN or CFT approach. Postdebridement computed tomography (CT) scanning assessed remaining debris. Additional outcome measures included time of debris removal, number of different angled blades utilized, and clogging.
RESULTS: A significantly greater amount of debris was left after the TN approach compared with CFT (3.88 cm(3) vs 2.88 cm(3), p = 0.015). Median blade utilization was significantly higher with the TN approach vs CFT (4 vs 1, p < 0.002). Time for debris eradication with CFT was similar regardless of expertise (323.4 vs 272.4 seconds, p = 0.21), but the TN approach showed a statistical difference in time-to-completion (698.8 vs 438.51 seconds, p = 1.7 × 10(-5)).
CONCLUSION: Controversy surrounds the appropriate application of CFT due to disease process and approach-related morbidity. Rhinologists should have numerous well-studied options at their disposal. This model suggests that maxillary debris removal is accomplished more thoroughly with fewer microdebrider blades when a CFT approach is employed.