MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/njcp.njcp_743_22

Медицинская библиотека · Nigerian journal of clinical practice · 2023

Incidence of missed middle mesial canal in endodontically treated mandibular molar teeth: A cone-beam computed tomography study.

Tartuk G A, Kaya S

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

In endodontic treatment, the aim is to completely determine, shape, and fill all root canals in a three-dimensional way. Missed canals lead to treatment failure. In mandibular molars, there may be an extra canal called the middle mesial canal between the mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of missed middle mesial canals in root canal-treated mandibular molar teeth.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

In this study, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 1054 patients were analyzed. We identified 121 endodontically treated mandibular molars and evaluated the prevalence of missed canals.

RESULTS

Although 33.05% of the root canal-treated teeth did not have a middle mesial canal, this canal was detected in the other 66.94%; 97.53% of teeth with a middle mesial canal could not be detected by clinicians.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians performing endodontic treatment of mandibular molar teeth should not ignore the presence of the middle mesial canal. Thus, it is very important for clinicians to have sufficient information about the localization, morphology, and variations of the middle mesial canal.

Для цитирования: Tartuk G A, Kaya S. Incidence of missed middle mesial canal in endodontically treated mandibular molar teeth: A cone-beam computed tomography study.. Nigerian journal of clinical practice. 2023. DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_743_22.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.