MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0022215111002283

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2011

Pneumosinus dilatans, pneumocoele or air cyst? A case report and literature review.

Teh B M, Hall C, Chan S W

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Pathological paranasal sinus expansion secondary to air is uncommon. However, this condition may be symptomatic or cosmetically apparent, requiring surgical intervention. Various terms have been used to describe this condition, and nomenclature is controversial.

METHOD: An 18-year-old man presented with right facial pain, and was subsequently found to have pneumosinus dilatans of the maxillary sinus. A search was conducted of the PubMed, Medline and Embase databases, using the key words 'pneumosinus dilatans', 'pneumoc(o)ele', 'pneumatoc(o)ele' and 'maxillary sinus'. Articles were also hand-searched. Relevant articles published in English were reviewed.

RESULTS

The literature review identified 36 cases involving the maxillary sinus (including the present case), with 19 cases reported as pneumosinus dilatans, 12 as pneumocoeles, two as pneumatocoeles, two as pneumosinus dilatans multiplex and one as an air cyst. However, based on the strict classification described by Urken et al., the majority of these cases should be reclassified as pneumocoeles.

CONCLUSION

Whilst the nomenclature of this pathology is confusing, distinctions of terminology do not alter the management. Hence, we support the use of the term 'air cyst', to incorporate all these lesions.

Для цитирования: Teh B M, Hall C, Chan S W. Pneumosinus dilatans, pneumocoele or air cyst? A case report and literature review.. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2011. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215111002283.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.