American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2023
In-vivo evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Driven Remote Monitoring technology for tracking tooth movement and reconstruction of 3-dimensional digital models during orthodontic treatment.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Homsi Karen, Snider Vivian, Kusnoto Budi, Atsawasuwan Phimon, Viana Grace, Allareddy Veerasathpurush, Gajendrareddy Praveen, Elnagar Mohammed H
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: An in-vivo evaluation of the Dental Monitoring (DM; Paris, France) Artificial Intelligence Driven Remote Monitoring technology was conducted in an active clinical setting. Our objectives were to compare the accuracy and validity of the 3-dimensional (3D) digital models remotely generated from the DM application to 3D Digital Models generated from the iTero Element 5D intraoral scanner (Align Technologies, San Jose, Calif) of patients' dentition during in-vivo fixed orthodontic treatment.
METHODS: The orthodontic treatment of 24 patients (aged 14-55 years) was tracked across an average of 13.4 months. Scans of the maxillary and mandibular arches of each patient were taken by an iTero intraoral scanner and with the DM application before treatment initiation without (T0) and with (T1) the fixed orthodontic appliances and at every in-person adjustment appointment (T2-T10). The global deviation between the reconstructed digital models from the DM and iTero scans was compared at each time point using Geomagic Control-X 2020 (3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC). Descriptive analysis was conducted to determine the mean deviation at each time point for the maxillary and mandibular arches, to compare the maxilla and mandible mean deviations at each time point to the null hypothesis mean of 0 mm and the paired mean of the average at each time point between the maxilla and mandible.
RESULTS: The findings revealed no clinically significant difference between the reconstructed digital models generated by the iTero IOS and the remotely reconstructed digital dental models generated by the DM application.
CONCLUSION: DM artificial intelligence tracking algorithm can track tooth movement and reconstruct 3D digital models to a clinically acceptable degree for orthodontic application.
METHODS: The orthodontic treatment of 24 patients (aged 14-55 years) was tracked across an average of 13.4 months. Scans of the maxillary and mandibular arches of each patient were taken by an iTero intraoral scanner and with the DM application before treatment initiation without (T0) and with (T1) the fixed orthodontic appliances and at every in-person adjustment appointment (T2-T10). The global deviation between the reconstructed digital models from the DM and iTero scans was compared at each time point using Geomagic Control-X 2020 (3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC). Descriptive analysis was conducted to determine the mean deviation at each time point for the maxillary and mandibular arches, to compare the maxilla and mandible mean deviations at each time point to the null hypothesis mean of 0 mm and the paired mean of the average at each time point between the maxilla and mandible.
RESULTS: The findings revealed no clinically significant difference between the reconstructed digital models generated by the iTero IOS and the remotely reconstructed digital dental models generated by the DM application.
CONCLUSION: DM artificial intelligence tracking algorithm can track tooth movement and reconstruct 3D digital models to a clinically acceptable degree for orthodontic application.