Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS · 2023
Evaluation of facial artery course variations, diameters, and depth by Doppler ultrasonography.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shen Wei-Wei, Jiao Chen-Bo, Ma Jian-Xun, Xia You-Chen, Cui Li-Gang
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The facial artery (FA) is the main blood vessel supplying blood to the face. It is essential to understand the anatomy of FA around the nasolabial fold (NLF). This study aimed to provide the detailed anatomy and relative positioning of FA to help avoid unexpected complications in plastic surgery.
METHODS: FA was observed from the inferior border of the mandible to the end of its terminal branch in 66 hemifaces of 33 patients with Doppler ultrasonography. The evaluation parameters were: (1) location, (2) diameter, (3) FA-skin depth, (4) relationship between the NLF and FA, (5) distance between the FA and significant surgical landmarks, and (6) the running layer. The FA course is classified based on the terminal branch.
RESULTS: The most common FA course was Type 1, which had an angular branch as the final branch (59.1%). The most common FA-NLF relationship was that the FA was situated inferior to the NLF (50.0%). The mean FA diameter was 1.56 ± 0.36 mm at the mandibular origin, 1.40 ± 0.37 mm at the cheilion, and 1.32 ± 0.34 mm at the nasal ala. The FA diameter on the right hemiface was thicker than that on the left hemiface (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The FA mainly terminates in the angular branch, running in the medial NLF and in dermis and subcutaneous tissue, with a blood supply advantage in the right hemisphere. We suppose that a deep injection into periosteum around the NLF may be safer than an injection into the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) layer.
METHODS: FA was observed from the inferior border of the mandible to the end of its terminal branch in 66 hemifaces of 33 patients with Doppler ultrasonography. The evaluation parameters were: (1) location, (2) diameter, (3) FA-skin depth, (4) relationship between the NLF and FA, (5) distance between the FA and significant surgical landmarks, and (6) the running layer. The FA course is classified based on the terminal branch.
RESULTS: The most common FA course was Type 1, which had an angular branch as the final branch (59.1%). The most common FA-NLF relationship was that the FA was situated inferior to the NLF (50.0%). The mean FA diameter was 1.56 ± 0.36 mm at the mandibular origin, 1.40 ± 0.37 mm at the cheilion, and 1.32 ± 0.34 mm at the nasal ala. The FA diameter on the right hemiface was thicker than that on the left hemiface (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The FA mainly terminates in the angular branch, running in the medial NLF and in dermis and subcutaneous tissue, with a blood supply advantage in the right hemisphere. We suppose that a deep injection into periosteum around the NLF may be safer than an injection into the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) layer.