MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11684-007-0023-5

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers of medicine in China · 2007

The clinicopathologic features of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.

Qin Xinyu, Liu Fenglin

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Since first described in 1982, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) has been the preferred term to describe the proliferation of the pancreatic ductal epithelium. It is totally different from pancreatic carcinoma in epidemiology, histology, pathology and prognosis. According to the site of involvement, IPMNs are classified into three categories, i.e. main duct type, branch duct type, and combined type. Most branch duct IPMNs are benign, whereas the other two types are often malignant. A large branch duct IPMN and marked dilation of the main pancreatic duct indicate the presence of adenoma at least. The additional existence of large mural nodules increases the possibility of malignancy in all types. The prognosis is more favorable after complete resection of benign and non-invasive malignant IPMNs. Malignant IPMNs that become more aggressive after parenchymal invasion necessitate adequate lymph node dissection. On the other hand, asymptomatic branch duct IPMNs without mural nodules can be observed without the need for resection for a considerable period of time. Our review addresses available data, current understanding, controversy, and future directions about IPMNs.

Для цитирования: Qin Xinyu, Liu Fenglin. The clinicopathologic features of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.. Frontiers of medicine in China. 2007. DOI: 10.1007/s11684-007-0023-5.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.