MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.09.011

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2016

Cervical cancer screening after 50: near extinction?

Abdullah Nik N, Daud Suzanna, Al-Kubaisy Waqar, Saari Izni S, Saad Siti R

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence and predictors of Pap smear screening among women aged 50 years and older.

STUDY

DESIGN

This cross-sectional study was conducted at two large urban health centres in Selangor. A total of 515 women aged 50 and older were recruited.

RESULTS

The mean age of the respondents was 58.83±7.05, with a range of 50- 83 years. The prevalence of Pap smear screening was 39.22% (n=202). From the multivariate analysis, Pap smear screening was significantly associated with health care provider advice (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=18.75; 95% CI=8.30, 42.37); tertiary (AOR=11.26; 95% CI=1.50, 84.68) and secondary education level (AOR=9.47; 95% CI=1.43, 62.84); use of contraception (AOR=2.90; 95% CI=1.48, 5.69); heart disease (AOR=0.22; 95% CI=0.05, 0.97); and worry about Pap smear results (AOR=0.20; 95% CI=0.09, 0.42).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of Pap smear screening in the older women is unsatisfactory. Health care provider advice, education level, use of contraception, heart disease and worry about Pap smear results were predictors of undergoing Pap smear screening in this study population.

Для цитирования: Abdullah Nik N, Daud Suzanna, Al-Kubaisy Waqar, Saari Izni S, Saad Siti R. Cervical cancer screening after 50: near extinction?. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.09.011.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.