Fertility and sterility · 2001
Tolerability of the mini-pan-endoscopic approach (transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy and minihysteroscopy) versus hysterosalpingography in an outpatient infertility investigation.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cicinelli E, Matteo M, Causio F, Schonauer L M, Pinto V, Galantino P
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the acceptance and tolerability of the mini-pan-endoscopic approach (transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy [THL] combined with minihysteroscopy) versus hysterosalpingography (HSG) for evaluating tubal patency and the uterine cavity in an outpatient infertility investigation.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled study.
SETTING: University hospital.
PATIENT(S): Twenty-three infertile patients without obvious pelvic pathology.
INTERVENTION(S): Women were randomly divided into two groups. One group underwent minihysteroscopy and THL with tube chromoperturbation as first investigation and HSG within the following 7 days, while in the other group the investigation sequence was inverted. Women reported pain experienced before and at the end of procedures.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Mean duration of procedures, level of pain experienced, diagnostic agreement about tubal patency and uterine cavity normality.
RESULT(S): THL and minihysteroscopy took significantly more time but was significantly less painful than HSG. Regarding tubal patency, in 95.5% of cases THL agreed with HSG. In one case, HSG diagnosed a bilateral obstruction of tubes, whereas at THL a bilateral spreading of methylene blue was seen. Agreement on intrauterine pathologies between minihysteroscopy and HSG was poor (43%); the number of intrauterine abnormalities found at hysteroscopy was significantly greater than at HSG.
CONCLUSION(S): THL in association with minihysteroscopy provided more information and was better tolerated than HSG in an outpatient infertility investigation.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled study.
SETTING: University hospital.
PATIENT(S): Twenty-three infertile patients without obvious pelvic pathology.
INTERVENTION(S): Women were randomly divided into two groups. One group underwent minihysteroscopy and THL with tube chromoperturbation as first investigation and HSG within the following 7 days, while in the other group the investigation sequence was inverted. Women reported pain experienced before and at the end of procedures.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Mean duration of procedures, level of pain experienced, diagnostic agreement about tubal patency and uterine cavity normality.
RESULT(S): THL and minihysteroscopy took significantly more time but was significantly less painful than HSG. Regarding tubal patency, in 95.5% of cases THL agreed with HSG. In one case, HSG diagnosed a bilateral obstruction of tubes, whereas at THL a bilateral spreading of methylene blue was seen. Agreement on intrauterine pathologies between minihysteroscopy and HSG was poor (43%); the number of intrauterine abnormalities found at hysteroscopy was significantly greater than at HSG.
CONCLUSION(S): THL in association with minihysteroscopy provided more information and was better tolerated than HSG in an outpatient infertility investigation.