MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.15537/smj.2016.5.13904

Медицинская библиотека · Saudi medical journal · 2016

Radiological sinonasal anatomy. Exploring the Saudi population.

Alrumaih Redha A, Ashoor Mona M, Obidan Ahmed A, Al-Khater Khulood M, Al-Jubran Saeed A

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prevalence of common radiological variants of sinonasal anatomy among Saudi population and compare it with the reported prevalence of these variants in other ethnic and population groups.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of 121 computerized tomography scans of the nose and paranasal sinuses of patients presented with sinonasal symptoms to the Department of Otorhinolarngology, King Fahad Hospital of the University, Khobar, Saudi Arabia, between January 2014 and May 2014.

RESULTS

Scans of 121 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria were reviewed. Concha bullosa was found in 55.4%, Haller cell in 39.7%, and Onodi cell  in 28.9%. Dehiscence of the internal carotid artery was found in 1.65%. Type-1 and type-2 optic nerve were the prevalent types. Type-II Keros classification of the depth of olfactory fossa was the most common among the sample (52.9%). Frontal cells were found in 79.3%; type I was the most common.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a difference in the prevalence of some radiological variants of the sinonasal anatomy between Saudi population and other study groups. Surgeon must pay special attention in the preoperative assessment of patients with sinonasal pathology to avoid undesirable complications.

Для цитирования: Alrumaih Redha A, Ashoor Mona M, Obidan Ahmed A, Al-Khater Khulood M, Al-Jubran Saeed A. Radiological sinonasal anatomy. Exploring the Saudi population.. Saudi medical journal. 2016. DOI: 10.15537/smj.2016.5.13904.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.