Orthopedic reviews · 2024
Outcome Comparison between Carpometacarpal Arthroplasty and Trapeziectomy in Patients with Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: A Systematic review.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hidajat Nucki Nursjamsi, Aditya Rio, Arsa Widya, Malik Realita
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal (CMC) is considered a common musculoskeletal disorder. The treatment of carpometacarpal osteoarthritis could be either by conservative or surgical methods. surgical treatment, there are various alternatives, including trapeziectomy and arthroplasty. This study aims to perform a systematic review of the literature to determine the functional outcomes associated with trapeziectomy and arthroplasty in CMC arthritis.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the functional outcomes associated with trapeziectomy and arthroplasty in CMC arthritis patients.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and performed on August 2022 by one independent reviewer (author) using PubMed database, EBSCO Host, EMBASE, and ScienceDirect. The literature search will be based on Patients, Intervention, Control, and Outcome (PICO) criteria, as mentioned in the following: Patients with any carpometacarpal arthritis; with the intervention of using carpometacarpal arthroplasty as their method of surgery; control with trapeziectomy and primary outcome of functional outcome. Clinical outcomes using patient-reported outcome measures and complications were included. The quality of the included studies was evaluated with Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tools. Quantitative analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.4.
RESULTS: Three studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Both treatments resulted in significant improvements in functional scores. When matching patients according to preoperative function, patients receiving arthroplasty had better postoperative function (Quick DASH: trapeziectomy = 25.1, ARPE = 16.8).
CONCLUSION: This study showed that variable results of clinical outcomes improved after trapezeictomy and arthroplasty in patients with CMC arthritis. Evidence showed that arthroplasty allows for a better improvement in functional outcome.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the functional outcomes associated with trapeziectomy and arthroplasty in CMC arthritis patients.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and performed on August 2022 by one independent reviewer (author) using PubMed database, EBSCO Host, EMBASE, and ScienceDirect. The literature search will be based on Patients, Intervention, Control, and Outcome (PICO) criteria, as mentioned in the following: Patients with any carpometacarpal arthritis; with the intervention of using carpometacarpal arthroplasty as their method of surgery; control with trapeziectomy and primary outcome of functional outcome. Clinical outcomes using patient-reported outcome measures and complications were included. The quality of the included studies was evaluated with Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tools. Quantitative analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.4.
RESULTS: Three studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Both treatments resulted in significant improvements in functional scores. When matching patients according to preoperative function, patients receiving arthroplasty had better postoperative function (Quick DASH: trapeziectomy = 25.1, ARPE = 16.8).
CONCLUSION: This study showed that variable results of clinical outcomes improved after trapezeictomy and arthroplasty in patients with CMC arthritis. Evidence showed that arthroplasty allows for a better improvement in functional outcome.