MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fcell.2023.1021920

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023

Stepwise use of genomics and transcriptomics technologies increases diagnostic yield in Mendelian disorders.

Colin Estelle, Duffourd Yannis, Chevarin Martin, Tisserant Emilie, Verdez Simon, Paccaud Julien, Bruel Ange-Line, Tran Mau-Them Frédéric, Denommé-Pichon Anne-Sophie, Thevenon Julien, Safraou Hana, Besnard Thomas, Goldenberg Alice, Cogné Benjamin, Isidor Bertrand, Delanne Julian, Sorlin Arthur, Moutton Sébastien, Fradin Mélanie, Dubourg Christèle, Gorce Magali, Bonneau Dominique, El Chehadeh Salima, Debray François-Guillaume, Doco-Fenzy Martine, Uguen Kevin, Chatron Nicolas, Aral Bernard, Marle Nathalie, Kuentz Paul, Boland Anne, Olaso Robert, Deleuze Jean-François, Sanlaville Damien, Callier Patrick, Philippe Christophe, Thauvin-Robinet Christel, Faivre Laurence, Vitobello Antonio

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Purpose: Multi-omics offer worthwhile and increasingly accessible technologies to diagnostic laboratories seeking potential second-tier strategies to help patients with unresolved rare diseases, especially patients clinically diagnosed with a rare OMIM (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man) disease. However, no consensus exists regarding the optimal diagnostic care pathway to adopt after negative results with standard approaches.

Methods

In 15 unsolved individuals clinically diagnosed with recognizable OMIM diseases but with negative or inconclusive first-line genetic results, we explored the utility of a multi-step approach using several novel omics technologies to establish a molecular diagnosis. Inclusion criteria included a clinical autosomal recessive disease diagnosis and single heterozygous pathogenic variant in the gene of interest identified by first-line analysis (60%-9/15) or a clinical diagnosis of an X-linked recessive or autosomal dominant disease with no causative variant identified (40%-6/15). We performed a multi-step analysis involving short-read genome sequencing (srGS) and complementary approaches such as mRNA sequencing (mRNA-seq), long-read genome sequencing (lrG), or optical genome mapping (oGM) selected according to the outcome of the GS analysis.

Results

SrGS alone or in combination with additional genomic and/or transcriptomic technologies allowed us to resolve 87% of individuals by identifying single nucleotide variants/indels missed by first-line targeted tests, identifying variants affecting transcription, or structural variants sometimes requiring lrGS or oGM for their characterization.

Conclusion

Hypothesis-driven implementation of combined omics technologies is particularly effective in identifying molecular etiologies. In this study, we detail our experience of the implementation of genomics and transcriptomics technologies in a pilot cohort of previously investigated patients with a typical clinical diagnosis without molecular etiology.

Для цитирования: Colin Estelle, Duffourd Yannis, Chevarin Martin, Tisserant Emilie, Verdez Simon, Paccaud Julien, Bruel Ange-Line, Tran Mau-Them Frédéric, Denommé-Pichon Anne-Sophie, Thevenon Julien, Safraou Hana, Besnard Thomas, Goldenberg Alice, Cogné Benjamin, Isidor Bertrand, Delanne Julian, Sorlin Arthur, Moutton Sébastien, Fradin Mélanie, Dubourg Christèle, Gorce Magali, Bonneau Dominique, El Chehadeh Salima, Debray François-Guillaume, Doco-Fenzy Martine, Uguen Kevin, Chatron Nicolas, Aral Bernard, Marle Nathalie, Kuentz Paul, Boland Anne, Olaso Robert, Deleuze Jean-François, Sanlaville Damien, Callier Patrick, Philippe Christophe, Thauvin-Robinet Christel, Faivre Laurence, Vitobello Antonio. Stepwise use of genomics and transcriptomics technologies increases diagnostic yield in Mendelian disorders.. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology. 2023. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1021920.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.