European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2013
Comparison of optimal cytoreduction rates in emergency versus non-emergency admissions for advanced ovarian cancer: a multi-institutional study.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mangili G, Scambia G, Ottolina J, Fanfani F, Viganò R, Costantini B, Candiani M, Fagotti A
Аннотация
AIMS: to investigate whether first referral to the Emergency Department (ED) of a General Hospital is an independent risk-factor for suboptimal debulking compared to a similar population electively admitted to cytoreductive surgery, in a cohort of 307 AOC patients.
METHODS: this is a multicentre case-control study, analyzing a cohort of 307 AOC patients treated at San Raffaele Hospital of Milan (111 Center A) and Gemelli Hospital of Rome (196 Center B) between January 2006/2008 and December 2010. Women are classified as patients admitted to the Hospital from ED (Cases) and out-patients (Controls).
RESULTS: At univariate analysis, Cases significantly differ from Controls in terms of worse ECOG PS, larger ascites, pleuric effusion and peritoneal carcinomatosis. The rate of optimal cytoreduction is statistically lower in the Cases than Controls. At multivariate analysis, significant independent predictors for suboptimal residual disease resulted ED admission, peritoneal carcinosis and mesenteral involvement, supra radical surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted from Emergency Department may have a lower likelihood of optimal cytoreduction, due to their poor clinical characteristics and large diffusion of the disease.
METHODS: this is a multicentre case-control study, analyzing a cohort of 307 AOC patients treated at San Raffaele Hospital of Milan (111 Center A) and Gemelli Hospital of Rome (196 Center B) between January 2006/2008 and December 2010. Women are classified as patients admitted to the Hospital from ED (Cases) and out-patients (Controls).
RESULTS: At univariate analysis, Cases significantly differ from Controls in terms of worse ECOG PS, larger ascites, pleuric effusion and peritoneal carcinomatosis. The rate of optimal cytoreduction is statistically lower in the Cases than Controls. At multivariate analysis, significant independent predictors for suboptimal residual disease resulted ED admission, peritoneal carcinosis and mesenteral involvement, supra radical surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted from Emergency Department may have a lower likelihood of optimal cytoreduction, due to their poor clinical characteristics and large diffusion of the disease.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAged, 80 and overBiopsy, NeedleCase-Control StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalElective Surgical ProceduresEmergency Service, HospitalEmergency TreatmentFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunohistochemistryLymph NodesMesenteryMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingNeoplasm, ResidualOvarian NeoplasmsPeritoneal NeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsROC CurveRisk AssessmentSurvival AnalysisTime FactorsTreatment Outcome