Auris, nasus, larynx · 2020
Asymmetrical surface scanning registration for image-guided otologic surgery: A phantom study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Matsumoto Nozomu, Yamashita Makoto, Cho Byunghyun, Komune Noritaka, Hashizume Makoto
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To develop a registration procedure to achieve a higher degree of registration accuracy in image-guided otological surgery, paying particular attention to the registration centroid.
METHODS: A head phantom was used to measure the target registration error (TRE) at measurement points at various depth from the surface of the head. The surface-matching registration was performed using a commercially available surgical navigation system. We registered the phantom using only one ear of either side (right 100% - left 0%, or right 0% - left 100%) or using both ears with variable ratios (right 75% - left 25%, right 50% - left 50%, or right 25% - left 75%).
RESULTS: The overall TRE was the smallest when registration was performed equally on both sides. However, the TRE at 20-50 mm from the surface was the smallest when the fiducial points for the registration were collected asymmetrically at a ratio of 75:25 and weighed heavier on the operating side, and this difference was statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: The accuracy of image-guided surgery can be improved by carefully planning the registration procedure without changing the procedure itself. Accurate image-guided surgery at the middle and inner ear was achieved using 75% of the point cloud for the operating side and 25% of that for the opposite side for the registration.
METHODS: A head phantom was used to measure the target registration error (TRE) at measurement points at various depth from the surface of the head. The surface-matching registration was performed using a commercially available surgical navigation system. We registered the phantom using only one ear of either side (right 100% - left 0%, or right 0% - left 100%) or using both ears with variable ratios (right 75% - left 25%, right 50% - left 50%, or right 25% - left 75%).
RESULTS: The overall TRE was the smallest when registration was performed equally on both sides. However, the TRE at 20-50 mm from the surface was the smallest when the fiducial points for the registration were collected asymmetrically at a ratio of 75:25 and weighed heavier on the operating side, and this difference was statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: The accuracy of image-guided surgery can be improved by carefully planning the registration procedure without changing the procedure itself. Accurate image-guided surgery at the middle and inner ear was achieved using 75% of the point cloud for the operating side and 25% of that for the opposite side for the registration.