Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2019
The Cricothyroid versus Spray-As-You-Go Method for Topical Anesthesia during Flexible Bronchoscopy: The CRISP Randomized Clinical Trial.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Madan Karan, Mittal Saurabh, Gupta Nishkarsh, Biswal Shiba Kalyan, Tiwari Pawan, Hadda Vijay, Mohan Anant, Guleria Randeep
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Comparative characteristics of the cricothyroid injection and spray-as-you-go methods for lidocaine administration during diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy are not clear.
OBJECTIVES: Co-primary outcomes were comparison of cough count from bronchoscope introduction until reaching carina and operator-rated overall procedure satisfaction on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) between groups. Secondary outcomes were cumulative lidocaine dose, procedure duration, assistant-rated cough, willingness to return for repeat procedure, and procedural complications between groups.
METHODS: Consecutive subjects were randomized (1:1) to either the cricothyroid or the spray-as-you-go method for topical anesthesia to the vocal cords and trachea. All received nasal 2% lidocaine gel and pharyngeal 10% lidocaine spray.
RESULTS: A total of 500 subjects were randomized, and 495 subjects were analyzed (248 cricothyroid and 247 spray-as-you-go). Cough count until reaching carina (median [range]) was significantly lower (cricothyroid, 1 [0-10], and spray-as-you-go, 4 [0-30], p < 0.0001) and operator-rated overall procedure satisfaction, VAS (mean ± standard deviation) (cricothyroid, 7.86 ± 1.39 and spray-as-you-go, 6.86 ± 1.59, p < 0.0001) significantly greater in the cricothyroid group. Patient willingness to return for repeat procedure was greater (87.1 vs. 70.5%, p < 0.001)) and cumulative lidocaine dose significantly lower (305.08 ± 13.40 vs. 322.18 ± 10.67 mg, p < 0.001) in the cricothyroid group. Minor complications occurred in 6 patients in the cricothyroid group and 9 patients in the spray-as-you-go group.
CONCLUSION: Cricothyroid lidocaine administration is associated with less cough and superior operator-rated procedure satisfaction during bronchoscopy at a lower cumulative lidocaine dose.
OBJECTIVES: Co-primary outcomes were comparison of cough count from bronchoscope introduction until reaching carina and operator-rated overall procedure satisfaction on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) between groups. Secondary outcomes were cumulative lidocaine dose, procedure duration, assistant-rated cough, willingness to return for repeat procedure, and procedural complications between groups.
METHODS: Consecutive subjects were randomized (1:1) to either the cricothyroid or the spray-as-you-go method for topical anesthesia to the vocal cords and trachea. All received nasal 2% lidocaine gel and pharyngeal 10% lidocaine spray.
RESULTS: A total of 500 subjects were randomized, and 495 subjects were analyzed (248 cricothyroid and 247 spray-as-you-go). Cough count until reaching carina (median [range]) was significantly lower (cricothyroid, 1 [0-10], and spray-as-you-go, 4 [0-30], p < 0.0001) and operator-rated overall procedure satisfaction, VAS (mean ± standard deviation) (cricothyroid, 7.86 ± 1.39 and spray-as-you-go, 6.86 ± 1.59, p < 0.0001) significantly greater in the cricothyroid group. Patient willingness to return for repeat procedure was greater (87.1 vs. 70.5%, p < 0.001)) and cumulative lidocaine dose significantly lower (305.08 ± 13.40 vs. 322.18 ± 10.67 mg, p < 0.001) in the cricothyroid group. Minor complications occurred in 6 patients in the cricothyroid group and 9 patients in the spray-as-you-go group.
CONCLUSION: Cricothyroid lidocaine administration is associated with less cough and superior operator-rated procedure satisfaction during bronchoscopy at a lower cumulative lidocaine dose.