The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2015
The influence of hemostatic agents on bone healing after sternotomy in a porcine model.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vestergaard Rikke F, Brüel Annemarie, Thomsen Jesper S, Hauge Ellen M, Søballe Kjeld, Hasenkam J Michael
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Sternotomy is the preferred access to the mediastinum. During sternotomy, trabecular bone is exposed, often resulting in bleeding, which can be treated with mechanical hemostatic agents; however, their influence on the healing process is relatively unexplored. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of two hemostatic agents: bone wax (BW) and a water-soluble polymer wax, Ostene (WSW), on the mechanical and histologic characteristics of healing sternal bone.
METHODS: Twenty-four pigs underwent sternotomy and were randomized into three groups: WSW, BW, or no hemostatic treatment (control). Bone samples were obtained 6 weeks postoperatively.
RESULTS: Fracture strength (Fmax) and maximum stiffness (dF/dx) was lower in the BW group than in controls (Fmax: 175.2 vs. 255.8 N, dF/dx: 165.2 vs. 375.4 N/mm,) (p < 0.05). The stiffness did not differ statistically between the WSW and BW groups (298.4 vs 165.2 N/mm) nor did the fracture strength (211.4 vs 175.2 N). The fraction of granulomatous tissue was higher in the BW group compared with both the WSW group (79.1 vs. 16.52%) (p < 0.001) and controls (79.1 vs. 11.2%) (p < 0.001). There was more calcified tissue in controls than in the BW group (23.4 vs. 10.8%) (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In a porcine model, BW significantly inhibited sternal healing and was associated with chronic inflammation and reduced mechanical integrity. The WSW did not, to the same degree as BW, inhibit bone healing and thus presents an alternative treatment option for sternal bleeding.
METHODS: Twenty-four pigs underwent sternotomy and were randomized into three groups: WSW, BW, or no hemostatic treatment (control). Bone samples were obtained 6 weeks postoperatively.
RESULTS: Fracture strength (Fmax) and maximum stiffness (dF/dx) was lower in the BW group than in controls (Fmax: 175.2 vs. 255.8 N, dF/dx: 165.2 vs. 375.4 N/mm,) (p < 0.05). The stiffness did not differ statistically between the WSW and BW groups (298.4 vs 165.2 N/mm) nor did the fracture strength (211.4 vs 175.2 N). The fraction of granulomatous tissue was higher in the BW group compared with both the WSW group (79.1 vs. 16.52%) (p < 0.001) and controls (79.1 vs. 11.2%) (p < 0.001). There was more calcified tissue in controls than in the BW group (23.4 vs. 10.8%) (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In a porcine model, BW significantly inhibited sternal healing and was associated with chronic inflammation and reduced mechanical integrity. The WSW did not, to the same degree as BW, inhibit bone healing and thus presents an alternative treatment option for sternal bleeding.