Surgical technology international · 2017
Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with the Use of Barbed Sutures.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Porreca Angelo, Salvaggio Antonio, Dandrea Matteo, Cappa Emanuele, Zuccala Alessio, Del Rosso Alessandro, D'Agostino Daniele
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to analyze the principal advantages of posterior muscolo-fascial reconstruction using knotless barbed sutures (BS) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the available evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of principal BS (Quill SRS Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc., Vancouver, Canada; V-Loc Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland; STRATAFIX Ethicon Inc., Somerville, New Jersey; Filbloc® Assut Europe S.p.A., Rome, Italy).
RESULTS: We analysed the principal outcomes (operative time and suturing time of urethra-vesical anastomosis, length of catheterization, hospital stay, and postoperative complications rate) reported in literature.
CONCLUSIONS: In light of our experience, we believe that the utilization of BS during RARP is safe as the development of a new surgical technique of urethrovesical anastomosis offers advantages in terms of continence rate, length of catheterization, and other surgical outcomes. Other studies (prospective trials) are necessary to investigate the real benefits of BS in comparison to conventional sutures (CS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the available evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of principal BS (Quill SRS Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc., Vancouver, Canada; V-Loc Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland; STRATAFIX Ethicon Inc., Somerville, New Jersey; Filbloc® Assut Europe S.p.A., Rome, Italy).
RESULTS: We analysed the principal outcomes (operative time and suturing time of urethra-vesical anastomosis, length of catheterization, hospital stay, and postoperative complications rate) reported in literature.
CONCLUSIONS: In light of our experience, we believe that the utilization of BS during RARP is safe as the development of a new surgical technique of urethrovesical anastomosis offers advantages in terms of continence rate, length of catheterization, and other surgical outcomes. Other studies (prospective trials) are necessary to investigate the real benefits of BS in comparison to conventional sutures (CS).